Literature DB >> 18768441

Developing a standardized cephalometric vocabulary: choices and possible strategies.

Randall F Stewart1, Heather Edgar, Charles Tatlock, Philip J Kroth.   

Abstract

The science of cephalometry has been invaluable for guiding orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcomes tracking. Though software packages easily calculate most cephalometric measurements, the ability to exchange cephalometric data between software packages is poorly developed. Hindering this effort is the lack of an agreed-upon standard for electronic exchange of cephalometric measurements. Unlike more technological issues, the problem of creating such a standard is one of formalizing decisions already established through historical precedent. Solving this problem will require education, cooperation, and consensus in order to reap the potential improvements to patient care, dental education, and research. The first step in overcoming these remaining issues is awareness. This article reviews those factors that place cephalometric measurements in an excellent position for standardization, outlines those decisions that must be made in order to realize the goal of electronic exchange of cephalometric information, and describes some of the options for these decisions as well as some advantages and disadvantages of each.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768441      PMCID: PMC2755070     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  11 in total

1.  Clinical terminology: why is it so hard?

Authors:  A L Rector
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Guideline and quality indicators for development, purchase and use of controlled health vocabularies.

Authors:  Peter L Elkin; Steven H Brown; John Carter; Brent A Bauer; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; Larry Bergstrom; Mark Pittelkow; Cornelius Rosse
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update.

Authors:  Clement J McDonald; Stanley M Huff; Jeffrey G Suico; Gilbert Hill; Dennis Leavelle; Raymond Aller; Arden Forrey; Kathy Mercer; Georges DeMoor; John Hook; Warren Williams; James Case; Pat Maloney
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Grand challenges in dental informatics.

Authors:  D F Sittig; M Kirshner; G Maupomé
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  2003-12

5.  Why integration is key for dental office technology.

Authors:  Titus K L Schleyer
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  ADA initiates development of orthodontic informatics standards.

Authors:  William E Harrell; Sharon Stanford; Paul Bralower
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.

Authors:  Serge Kazandjian; Stavros Kiliaridis; Anestis Mavropoulos
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Cephalometry.

Authors:  Peter J Taub
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Regional size differences in four commonly used cephalometric atlases: the Ann Arbor, Cleveland (Bolton), London (UK), and Philadelphia atlases compared.

Authors:  J M H Dibbets; K Nolte
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Solving incompatibilities between electronic records for orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Antonio Magni; Robson de Oliveira Albuquerque; Rafael Timóteo de Sousa; Mark G Hans; Franco G Magni
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using LOINC to link 10 terminology standards to one unified standard in a specialized domain.

Authors:  Philip J Kroth; Shamsi Daneshvari; Edward F Harris; Daniel J Vreeman; Heather J H Edgar
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.317

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.