Literature DB >> 18768347

Test--retest reliability of a modified multiple point stimulation technique for motor unit number estimation.

Cheryl L Porter1, Arodi Alvarez, Kelvin E Jones, K Ming Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multiple point stimulation (MPS) is a widely used technique to estimate the number of motor units in a muscle. Test-retest reliability must be high for the motor unit number estimates to be clinically useful. We hypothesized that the reliability of MPS can be improved by using a long stimulus pulse width (1ms), in addition to the standard 0.05ms pulse width.
METHODS: Median nerve innervated thenar muscles were examined in 11 young subjects, 27+/-3 (mean +/-SD) years old and in 5 elderly subjects, 71+/-11 years old. The experimenter conducted the studies twice on each subject.
RESULTS: Test-retest reliability, using the modified MPS technique, was substantially higher (Cronbach's alpha of 0.88) than using the standard method (Cronbach's alpha of 0.80) in the young subjects. In contrast, for the elderly subjects the test-retest reliability of MUNE was high for both the modified technique (Cronbach's alpha of 0.96) and the standard technique (Cronbach's alpha of 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Test-retest reliability of MPS can be significantly improved by using a long stimulus pulse width and the standard stimulus pulse width in younger subjects. However, this is not necessary in elderly subjects. SIGNIFICANCE: The greater reliability of this modified MPS method should enhance its clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768347      PMCID: PMC5017865          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  13 in total

1.  Reproducibility of motor unit number estimation in individual subjects.

Authors:  Z Simmons; D K Epstein; B Borg; D T Mauger; M J Kothari; J M Shefner
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.217

2.  Improving the accuracy of the multiple point stimulation technique.

Authors:  Cheryl L Porter; Arodi Alvarez; Kelvin E Jones; Lora A Major; K Ming Chan
Journal:  Suppl Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009

3.  Simulations of motor unit number estimation techniques.

Authors:  Lora A Major; Kelvin E Jones
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.

Authors:  Joleen H Blok; Johannes P Van Dijk; Machiel J Zwarts; Dick F Stegeman
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 5.  Updating motor unit number estimation (MUNE).

Authors:  Mark B Bromberg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 6.  Invited review: motor unit estimation: methods, results, and present status.

Authors:  A J McComas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Number and relative size of thenar motor units estimated by an adapted multiple point stimulation method.

Authors:  F C Wang; P J Delwaide
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  The estimated numbers and relative sizes of thenar motor units as selected by multiple point stimulation in young and older adults.

Authors:  T J Doherty; W F Brown
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Methods for estimating the numbers of motor units in human muscles.

Authors:  T Doherty; Z Simmons; B O'Connell; K J Felice; R Conwit; K M Chan; T Komori; T Brown; D W Stashuk; W F Brown
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Thenar motor unit number estimates using the multiple point stimulation technique: reproducibility studies in ALS patients and normal subjects.

Authors:  K J Felice
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.