| Literature DB >> 18768169 |
R N Smith1, C Elcock, A Abdellatif, B Bäckman, J M Russell, A H Brook.
Abstract
AIMS: To enhance the phenotypic description and quantification of enamel defects from a North Sweden sample of extracted and exfoliated teeth originating from families with Amelogenesis Imperfecta by use of the extended enamel defects index (EDI) and image analysis to demonstrate the comparable reliability and value of the additional measurements. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18768169 PMCID: PMC2981871 DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.07.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Oral Biol ISSN: 0003-9969 Impact factor: 2.633
Fig. 1Custom built multi-axes adjustable calibrated holder for individual teeth.
Fig. 2Deciduous molar showing total view surface area and demarcated opacities outlined.
Fleiss’ intra-class correlation coefficient for repeat measures for hypoplastic lesions and opacity surface area and tooth view surface area for 24 buccal, 24 lingual and 23 occlusal surfaces (tooth types combined) using image analysis.
| Surface measured | Fleiss’ ICCC | Donner % Eliasziw classification of |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoplastic area | 0.99 | Excellent |
| Opacity area | 0.99 | Excellent |
| Buccal surface area | 0.99 | Excellent |
| Lingual surface area | 0.99 | Excellent |
| Occlusal surface area | 0.99 | Excellent |
Unweighted and Weighted Kappa values for reliability measurement for intra- and inter-operator assessment of all surface defects on 24 buccal and 24 lingual surfaces.
| Surface | Unweighted Kappa | Landis and Kock classification | Weighted Kappa | Landis and Kock classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buccal | ||||
| Intra-operator | 0.84 | Excellent | 0.80 | Substantial |
| Inter-operator | 0.74 | Substantial | 0.78 | Substantial |
| Lingual | ||||
| Intra-operator | 0.80 | Substantial | 0.76 | Substantial |
| Inter-operator | 0.69 | Substantial | 0.73 | Substantial |
Tooth surface frequency (%) of enamel defect sub-types found using the extended EDI.
| View | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buccal | Lingual | Occlusal | |||
| 116 | 116 | 23 | |||
| Incisal | Cervical | Incisal | Cervical | ||
| Hypoplasia | |||||
| Pits | 47.4 | 21.5 | 44.3 | 24.3 | 82.6 |
| Areas | 7.4 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 4.3 |
| Grooves | 4.3 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 |
| Opacity | |||||
| Demarcated | 7.8 | 10.3 | 16.5 | 21.1 | 13.1 |
| Diffuse | 53.4 | 47.4 | 53.0 | 37.4 | 39.1 |
| Post-eruptive breakdown | 21.6 | 3.4 | 13.0 | 6.9 | 39.13 |
Percentages add to more than 100% as more than one defect was present on some surfaces.
Number of teeth.
Sites.
Mean defect size per tooth surface type found using image analysis.
| Mean total defect size (mm) and percentage of tooth surface with any defect | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Labial (116) | Lingual (116) | Occlusal (23) | |
| Hypoplasia | |||
| Pits | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Areas | 4.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 |
| Grooves | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Post-eruptive breakdown | 3.9 | 5.5 | 3.2 |
| Demarcated Opacity | 2.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 |
Number of teeth in parathesis.