Literature DB >> 18767616

Eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements in nocturnal conditions: an analysis of the problem.

Marc Aubinet1.   

Abstract

A detailed analysis of the various processes at work in stable boundary layers was made. It pointed out that two main mechanisms may affect eddy covariance measurements in stable conditions and that their impacts were different. On one hand, intermittent turbulence produces strongly nonstationary events during which the validity of turbulent transport and storage measurements is uncertain. On the other hand, during breeze and drainage flow events, significant advection takes place and competes with turbulent flux and storage. Intermittent turbulence questions both the ability of eddy covariance systems to adequately capture turbulent flux and storage and the representativeness of the measurements. Ability of the systems to capture the fluxes could be improved by adapting the averaging time period or the high pass filtering characteristics. However, beyond this, the question of representativeness of the flux remains open as the flux measured during an intermittent turbulence event represents not only the source term, but also the removal of CO2 that built up in the control volume and that cannot be simply related to the source term. In these conditions, the u* discrimination is likely to be insufficient and should be completed with a stationarity criterion. Further research should allow determining better selection criteria. Advection occurs mainly in presence of flows associated with topographical slopes (drainage flows) or with land use changes (breezes). Direct advection measurements were performed at several sites, but the results were shown to be strongly site dependent. A classification based on the general flow pattern and on the source intensity evolution along streamlines was proposed here. Five different patterns were identified that helped to classify the different observations. The classification was found to be a fairly good fit for the observations. This could serve as a tool to better understand and quantify the fluxes at sites subjected to repeatable patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18767616     DOI: 10.1890/06-1336.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  8 in total

1.  Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on CO2 and COS flux measurements.

Authors:  Kukka-Maaria Kohonen; Roderick Dewar; Gianluca Tramontana; Aleksanteri Mauranen; Pasi Kolari; Linda M J Kooijmans; Dario Papale; Timo Vesala; Ivan Mammarella
Journal:  Biogeosciences       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 5.092

2.  Dealing with disjunct concentration measurements in eddy covariance applications: a comparison of available approaches.

Authors:  Lukas Hörtnagl; Robert Clement; Martin Graus; Albin Hammerle; Armin Hansel; Georg Wohlfahrt
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Carbonyl sulfide (COS) as a tracer for canopy photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal conductance: potential and limitations.

Authors:  Georg Wohlfahrt; Federico Brilli; Lukas Hörtnagl; Xiaobin Xu; Heinz Bingemer; Armin Hansel; Francesco Loreto
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  Amazon rainforest exchange of carbon and subcanopy air flow: Manaus LBA site--a complex terrain condition.

Authors:  Julio Tóta; David Roy Fitzjarrald; Maria A F da Silva Dias
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  The many meanings of gross photosynthesis and their implication for photosynthesis research from leaf to globe.

Authors:  Georg Wohlfahrt; Lianhong Gu
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Gross Primary Productivity of Four European Ecosystems Constrained by Joint CO2 and COS Flux Measurements.

Authors:  F M Spielmann; G Wohlfahrt; A Hammerle; F Kitz; M Migliavacca; G Alberti; A Ibrom; T S El-Madany; K Gerdel; G Moreno; O Kolle; T Karl; A Peressotti; G Delle Vedove
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.720

7.  Revisiting the choice of the driving temperature for eddy covariance CO2 flux partitioning.

Authors:  Georg Wohlfahrt; Marta Galvagno
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.734

8.  Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests.

Authors:  M Campioli; Y Malhi; S Vicca; S Luyssaert; D Papale; J Peñuelas; M Reichstein; M Migliavacca; M A Arain; I A Janssens
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.