BACKGROUND: Wire guided localization (WGL) for non-palpable breast cancer is technically difficult and patient unfriendly. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) takes advantage of the possibility to detect the tumor through the nuclear tracer that is injected directly into the tumor for the sentinel node procedure. METHODS: Forty patients with 41 invasive breast carcinomas were treated using ROLL. Patients received a dose of 120 Mbq 99mTc Nanocolloid intra-tumorally on the day of surgery or a dose of 370 Mbq 99mTc Nanocolloïd intra-tumorally the prior day. The sentinel node (SN) was located using patent blue and a gamma ray detection probe that was also employed to guide the tumor excision. RESULTS: In 31 patients (78%) the invasive tumor was adequately excised. In two cases (5%) a re-excision was required due to inadequately excised carcinoma in situ and in three patients (7.5%) both the invasive and the in situ tumor were inadequately excised. In 35 patients (88%) the SN was found and removed. CONCLUSIONS: The ROLL procedure seems to be an alternative to WGL in patients with non-palpable breast carcinoma. To determine the place of ROLL versus WGL in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancer, a randomized clinical trial is needed. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Wire guided localization (WGL) for non-palpable breast cancer is technically difficult and patient unfriendly. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) takes advantage of the possibility to detect the tumor through the nuclear tracer that is injected directly into the tumor for the sentinel node procedure. METHODS: Forty patients with 41 invasive breast carcinomas were treated using ROLL. Patients received a dose of 120 Mbq 99mTc Nanocolloid intra-tumorally on the day of surgery or a dose of 370 Mbq 99mTc Nanocolloïd intra-tumorally the prior day. The sentinel node (SN) was located using patent blue and a gamma ray detection probe that was also employed to guide the tumor excision. RESULTS: In 31 patients (78%) the invasive tumor was adequately excised. In two cases (5%) a re-excision was required due to inadequately excised carcinoma in situ and in three patients (7.5%) both the invasive and the in situ tumor were inadequately excised. In 35 patients (88%) the SN was found and removed. CONCLUSIONS: The ROLL procedure seems to be an alternative to WGL in patients with non-palpable breast carcinoma. To determine the place of ROLL versus WGL in the treatment of non-palpable breast cancer, a randomized clinical trial is needed. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Gregory Larrieux; Julie A Cupp; Junlin Liao; Carol E H Scott-Conner; Ronald J Weigel Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Benjamin K Y Chan; Jill A Wiseberg-Firtell; Ramesh H S Jois; Katrin Jensen; Riccardo A Audisio Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-12-31
Authors: S van Esser; M Hobbelink; J W Van Isselt; W P Th M Mali; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rick G Pleijhuis; Maurits Graafland; Jakob de Vries; Joost Bart; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-07-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Joanne Landman; Sagarika Kulawansa; Michael McCarthy; Russell Troedson; Michael Phillips; Jill Tinning; Donna Taylor Journal: J Med Radiat Sci Date: 2013-12-25