Literature DB >> 18766186

Treatment of localised resectable neuroblastoma. Results of the LNESG1 study by the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group.

B De Bernardi1, V Mosseri, H Rubie, V Castel, A Foot, R Ladenstein, G Laureys, M Beck-Popovic, A F de Lacerda, A D J Pearson, J De Kraker, P F Ambros, Y de Rycke, M Conte, P Bruzzi, J Michon.   

Abstract

Main objective of this study was to confirm that surgery alone is an effective and safe treatment for localised resectable neuroblastoma except stage 2 with amplified MYCN gene (MYCNA). Of 427 eligible stages 1-2 patients, 411 had normal MYCN and 16 had MYCNA. Of the 288 stage 1 patients with normal MYCN, 1 died of complications and 16 relapsed, 2 of whom died; 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6-97) and 98.9% (95% CI: 97.7-100), respectively. Of the 123 stage 2 patients with normal MYCN, 1 died of sepsis and 22 relapsed, 8 of whom died (RFS 82.8%, 95% CI: 76.2-89.5; OS 93.2%, 95% CI: 88.7-97.8). In stage 2, OS and RFS were worse for patients with elevated LDH and unfavourable histopathology. Of 16 children with MYCNA, 7 were stage 1 (5 relapses and 4 deaths) and 9 were stage 2 (3 relapses and 2 deaths) patients. In conclusion, surgery alone yielded excellent OS for both stage 1 and 2 neuroblastoma without MYCNA, although stage 2 patients with unfavourable histopathology and elevated LDH suffered a high number of relapses. Both stage 1 and 2 patients with MYCNA were at greater risk of relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766186      PMCID: PMC2567095          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Neuroblastoma, the most common extracranial solid tumour in childhood, originates from the primitive cells of the sympathetic nervous system (Caron and Pearson, 2005). Approximately half of the children diagnosed with neuroblastoma have metastatic disease on diagnosis and, except for infants (De Bernardi ), have a low probability of cure (De Bernardi ). The remaining children present with localised disease and have an overall better prognosis, mainly depending on the degree of tumour resection (Cecchetto ; von Schweinitz ). Indeed, completely resected tumours (INSS stage 1) (Brodeur ) rarely relapse and do not usually undergo postoperative chemotherapy (Kushner ; Alvarado ). By contrast, localised but unresectable neuroblastomas (INSS stage 3) require primary chemotherapy before surgical excision is attempted, and in any case have a greater likelihood of relapse and a lower cure rate (Garaventa ). An intermediate condition involves primary tumour resection that has left behind a small residue (INSS stage 2). Some authors have suggested leaving these tumour residues untreated (De Bernardi ; Perez ); however, some of these tumours relapse (occasionally in a disseminated form) and then require intensive treatment, which is sometimes unsuccessful. At present, only abnormal MYCN gene status is believed to correlate with worse outcome in these patients, and postoperative treatment is therefore deemed necessary only in such cases (Rubie ). A number of other factors, including regional lymph node involvement (Ninane ; Rosen ), tumour rupture (De Bernardi ), unfavourable histology (Perez ; Shimada ), DNA index (Bagatell ), and some biochemical markers (Hann ; Zeltzer ; Shuster ), have been associated with greater risk of relapse and death. In the early 1990s, the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma Group (SIOPEN) activated the first Localised Neuroblastoma European Study (LNESG1). The principal objectives of this study were to confirm that surgery alone suffices in all stage 1 children and to assess whether the same is true for stage 2 children with normal MYCN gene status. A secondary objective of the LNESG1 study was to establish a European registry for all localised neuroblastomas. In this report, we describe the outcome of both stage 1 and 2 patients stratified according to MYCN gene status.

Patients and methods

Patient registration and eligibility

The registration of children with suspected, localised neuroblastoma potentially eligible for the LNESG1 Study began in January 1995 and ended in October 1999. In an attempt to ensure the enrolment of children who had suffered major surgery-related complications, the investigators were requested to register all suspected cases with non-metastatic neuroblastoma before histological confirmation. Data were collected at the Study Coordinating Centre, located at the Institut Curie, Paris, France. Nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, and United Kingdom) participated in the study. To be eligible in the study, patients had to fulfil all of the following criteria: age on diagnosis below 20 years, histological diagnosis of neuroblastoma (excluding ganglioneuroma), evaluation of MYCN gene status, primary tumour resectability, the absence of metastasis, and no previous therapy. Informed consent was provided by a parent or guardian for each patient enrolled in the study. Study approval was obtained from the local institutional review boards.

Diagnostic procedures and metastatic workup

The diagnostic imaging of the tumour included ultrasound scan plus computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (Siegel ). These investigations were carried out in an effort to detect features (defined as surgical risk factors) that are believed to reduce the probability of complete tumour resection and that lead to increased risk of surgery-related complications. Immediate surgery was recommended for patients without surgical risk factors, whereas the remaining patients were to receive chemotherapy in preparation for surgery. Details regarding surgical risk factors and surgical guidelines have been reported elsewhere (Cecchetto ). Bone marrow infiltration was ruled out on the basis of four negative specimens (two bone marrow aspirates and two trephine core biopsies for children aged 1 year or more; 2–4 aspirates for infants). Skeletal involvement was evaluated by MIBG (iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy) or by technetium-99m-MDP scintigraphy in the absence of MIBG uptake or if MIBG scintigraphy had not been performed prior to surgery. Involvement of other organs, mainly the liver, lung, skin, and distant lymph nodes, was studied by ultrasound scan and/or computed tomography. Biochemical studies included the assay of catecholamine metabolites, that is vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid in the urine (Strenger ), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay in the serum. Vanillylmandelic acid, homovanillic acid, and LDH levels were considered to be abnormal if they exceeded twice the upper normal value.

Histopathology

Histological diagnosis was performed by the local pathologists according to the Shimada system and the related classification (Shimada , 2001). Non-MYCN amplified stage 2 tumours were reviewed by an European Pathology Panel (Navarro ).

Biological studies

To guarantee the reproducibility of the results, 11 laboratories from 9 European countries set up an European Neuroblastoma Quality Assessment (ENQUA) Group (Ambros ). This led to the establishment of common rules with regard to the handling of tumour materials, methods, and DNA probes to be used, and the interpretation of DNA blots and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) analyses. The evaluation of MYCN gene status in tumour cells was a prerequisite to enrolling patients in the study. MYCN gene amplification (MYCNA) was defined as a copy number of 10 or more, or a greater than fourfold increase in the MYCN signal number in comparison with the reference probe located on chromosome 2. Evaluation of DNA content was strongly recommended.

Adjuvant therapy

Stage 1 patients, regardless of MYCN gene status, and stage 2 patients without MYCNA received no adjuvant therapy (except for those with symptomatic spinal cord compression) (De Bernardi ) and were carefully followed up. Stage 2 patients with MYCNA were treated according to institutional guidelines.

Follow-up

Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed within 1 month of surgery to assess the degree of the residual tumour, if any. Patients were subsequently evaluated by clinical examination and ultrasound scan at least once every 3 months in the first year, and every 3–6 months over the following 5 years.

Tumour relapse and progression

In the event of relapse or progression, complete disease evaluation was carried out, including histological (or cytohistological) examination, assay of MYCN status, and metastatic workup. Local relapse was preferentially treated by surgery and standard-dose chemotherapy according to national protocols. Metastatic relapse was treated according to the current national stage 4 protocols.

Statistical analyses

The prospective European registration of localised neuroblastoma was activated in January 1995. Stage 1, 2 and 3 subjects were to be registered. According to LNESG1 protocol, 140 stage 2 patients without MYCNA were to be enrolled in this trial that involved surgery as the only treatment in an effort to assess whether the conservative approach alone was enough to keep the 3-year survival rate above 90%. Enrollment was expected to last 3.5 years. Four and a half years after the beginning of the study (which lasted from January 1995 to October 1999), a total of 123 stage 2 patients had been recruited, representing 16.7% of all localised neuroblastomas. At that time, the trial, as well as the prospective registration, was closed. The frequency of clinical, biological, and pathological features in various subgroups was compared by the χ2 test or by two-tailed Fisher's exact test when necessary. Overall survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) curves were estimated according to the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test, and were calculated from the day of tumour resection. Overall survival took all deaths into account. In RFS, local or distant recurrences were considered as events. Patients who did not relapse were censored at the time of death or last follow-up.

Results

Between January 1995 and October 1999, a total of 905 children and adolescents with suspected localised neuroblastoma were registered in the LNESG1 Study by 107 European institutions. Of these, 215 children were excluded for various reasons: inadequately assessed MYCN gene (95 cases), staging errors (47), wrong diagnosis (28), previous treatment (13, including 5 stage 2 patients presenting with symptomatic spinal cord compression), undefined histology (9), parental refusal (5), and other reasons (18) (Table 1). Of the 690 children with non-metastatic neuroblastoma, 192 had stage 3 disease and 71 had a diagnosis of ganglioneuroma, leaving 427 eligible children with localised resectable neuroblastoma (Table 1). Out of these 427 children, 411 (288 stage 1 and 123 stage 2) had normal MYCN gene status, whereas 16 (7 stage 1 and 9 stage 2) had MYCNA (Table 1). The following results refer to the stage 1 and 2 patients stratified as per MYCN status.
Table 1

Patients in the LNESG1 study

   No of patients
Enrolled 905
Excluded  215
  Inadequate MYCN gene assay95 
  Staging errors47 
  Wrong diagnosis28 
  Undefined histology9 
  Previous treatment13 
  Parental refusal5 
  Other reasons18 
   
Non-metastatic neuroblastoma  690
 Ineligible for the study 263
  Stage 3192 
  Ganglioneuroma71 
 Eligible for the study 427
  Study 1 295
   Without MYCNA288 
   With MYCNA7 
  Study 2 132
   Without MYCNA123 
   With MYCNA9 

LNESG1=Localised Neuroblastoma European Study.

Stage 1 and 2 patients without MYCNA

Patients’ characteristics at diagnosis

The main presenting characteristics of the 288 stage 1 and the 123 stage 2 children are listed in Table 2. There was a slight male predominance (M/F ratio, 1.4) among stage 1 patients, whereas the number of stage 2 males and females was almost the same. The median age of both stage 1 and stage 2 patients was 11 months, with similar percentages of patients in the two age groups considered (0–17, ⩾18 months). Stage 1 patients had more abdominal tumours than stage 2 patients (68.4 vs 49.6%; P<0.0025), and they more often had favourable histological features, as evaluated by the local pathologists (88.4 vs 79.8%; P<0.04), normal vanillylmandelic acid (67.4 vs 44.4%; P=0.0008) and normal homovanillic acid urinary excretion (67.5 vs 50.7%; P=0.015). The percentages of normal vs abnormal LDH serum levels (93.1 vs 92.2%) and aneuploid vs di-tetraploid DNA index (64.3 vs 61.8%) were similar.
Table 2

Stage 1 and 2 patients without MYCNA. Characteristics at diagnosis

  Stage
  1 (n=288)
2 (n=123)
 
Characteristics No. of patients % 95% CI No. of patients % 95% CI P-value
Gender
 Male1675852.3–63.76149.640.8–58.40.11
 Female1214236.3–47.76250.441.6–59.2 
 M/F ratio 1.4 1
        
Age (months) 0.63
 Median 1111 
  0–1718564.258.7–69.87661.853.2–70.4 
  >1810335.830.2–41.34738.229.6–46.8 
        
Site of primary tumour <0.0025
 Neck144.92.4–7.375.72.3–11.4 
 Thorax6522.517.7–27.4433526.5–43.4 
 Abdomen19768.463–73.86149.640.8–58.4 
 Pelvis124.21.9–6.5129.74.5–15 
        
Urine VMA (247 tested) 0.0008
 Normal11867.460.5–74.43244.433–55.9 
 Elevated5732.625.6–39.54055.644.1–67 
        
Urine HVA (231tested) 0.015
 Normal10867.560.2–74.83650.739.1–62.3 
 Elevated5232.525.2–39.83549.337.7–60.9 
        
Serum LDH (276 tested) 0.79
 Normal16193.189.3–96.89592.285.3–96.6 
 Elevated126.93.1–10.787.83.4–14.7 
        
Histopathologic category (320 tested) <0.04
 Favourable19188.484.2–92.78379.872.1–87.5 
 Unfavourable2511.67.3–15.82120.212.5–27.9 
        
DNA index (216 tested) 0.72
 Aneuploid9064.356.3–72.24761.850.9–72.8 
 Di-tetraploid5035.727.8–43.62938.227.2–49.1 

HVA=homovanillic acid; LDH=lactate dehydrogenase; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid.

Surgery-related complications

Among the 411 stage 1 and 2 patients, 1 (a stage 1 infant) died of surgery-related complications 2 days after the operation, owing to massive bleeding and multiple organ failure. Thirty patients (7.3%) – 17 out of 288 stage 1 (5.9%) and 13 out of 123 stage 2 subjects (10.6%) – developed non-fatal complications: Horner's syndrome (6 cases), pleural effusion or ascitis (5), renal ischaemia or damage (4), intestinal perforation (3), serious bleeding (2), vascular damage (2), severe infections (2), tracheostomy (1), neurological damage (1), and others (4).

Clinical course and survival

Stage 1. Patient follow-up ranged from 3 to 134 months (median, 72). Of the 288 patients, 1 died shortly after surgery (see above), and 16 relapsed 1–48 months after diagnosis (median, 5) (Table 3); the estimated 5-year RFS rate was therefore 94.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 91.6–97.0) (Figure 1A). Relapses occurred at the site of the primary tumour in five cases, at distant sites in seven, and both locally and at distant sites in four cases. Sites of metastases included various combinations of the following: bone (six cases), bone marrow (five), and liver and skin (three cases each). Among the 10 patients who had been diagnosed between 0 and 11 months of age, relapses occurred locally, or in the liver, skin, or bone marrow, and were interpreted as a possible evolution towards stage 4. Five of these patients were simply observed, whereas five were treated with a few cycles of chemotherapy; all survived (Table 3). The remaining six patients who relapsed were older than 1 year on diagnosis; two of these died (one of progressive disease and one of chemotherapy-related toxicity) and four survived (Table 3). The estimated 5-year OS was 98.9% (95% CI: 97.7–100) (Figure 1B). The 5-year OS of the 16 patients who relapsed was 87.5% (95% CI: 71.3–100).
Table 3

Relapses/progressions in 16 stage 1 patients without MYCNA

Case no. Age (months) Primary site Histopathology LDH Ploidy Site/time to relapse/progression Therapy Outcome
 10AESkin, 4 monthsNoneCR, 81 months
 21AFNB, Skin, L, 3 monthsNoneCR, 74 months
 31NeckFAnLocal, 3 monthsCTCR, 122 months
 41AFAnLocal, 10 monthsCTCR, 87 months
 52AFNL, 2 monthsCTCR, 62 months
 62AFNAnB, Skin, L, 5 monthsNoneCR, 67 months
 75AFNDLocal, B, 11 monthsNoneCR, 58 months
 87AFNAnBM, 1 monthCTCR, 117 months
 910TFNAnLocal, 3 monthsNoneCR, 112 months
1011AFNDLocal, 48 monthsCT, RTCR, 92 months
1126TFAnLocal, 23 monthsCT, SCR, 37 months
1226AUNAnB, BM, 3 monthsCT, SCR, 127 months
1352AEDBM, 11 monthsNoneCR, 70 months
1459ANLocal, B, 10 monthsCTCR, 89 months
1571TDLocal, BM, 5 monthsCTDOD, 24 months
16169ALocal, B, BM, 35 monthsCT, RTTD, 38 months

A=abdomen; An=aneuploid; B=bone; BM=bone marrow; CR=complete remission; CT=chemotherapy; D=diploid; DOD=dead of disease; E=elevated; F=favourable; L=liver; N=normal; RT=radiotherapy; S=surgery; T=thorax; TD=toxic death; U=unfavourable.

Figure 1

Five-year RFS (A) and OS (B) according to INSS stage.

Stage 2. Patient follow-up ranged from 10 to 137 months (median, 80). Of the 123 patients, 1 died of sepsis due to surgery-related spleen atrophy 18 months after tumour resection, and 22 relapsed 1–90 months after diagnosis (median, 6) (Table 4); the estimated 5-year RFS rate was therefore 82.8% (95% CI: 76.2–89.5) (Figure 1A). Relapses occurred locally in 13 cases, at distant sites in 1, and both locally and at distant sites in 8. Sites of metastases included various combinations of the following: bone (five cases), bone marrow (five), liver and lung (one case each) (Table 4). The median interval between diagnosis and relapse was 6 months, both in cases of local relapse and in those of relapse at distant sites. Of the 12 patients below 1 year of age on diagnosis who relapsed, 2 died, whereas 6 deaths occurred among the 10 patients aged 1 year or older. The eight deaths occurred 5–55 months after relapse, with no difference between patients who relapsed locally and those who relapsed at distant sites (30 months for both). The estimated 5-year OS was 93.2% (95% CI: 88.7–97.8) (Figure 1B). The 5-year OS of the 22 patients who relapsed was 56.1% (95% CI: 32.5–79.7).
Table 4

Relapses/progressions in 22 stage 2 patients without MYCNA

Case no. Age (months) Primary site INSS stage Histopathology LDH Ploidy Site/time to relapse/progression Therapy Outcome
 10P2AUNAnLocal, 6 monthsNoneCR, 134 months
 20P2BFLocal, 2 monthsCTLFU, 20 months
 31A2BFNAnLocal, 5 monthsCTDOD, 10 months
 42A2AFNAnLocal, 1 monthCTDOD, 10 months
 52T2AFNTeLocal, 4 monthsCTCR, 105 months
 62A2BFNDLocal, BM, 7 monthsCTCR, 88 months
 73A2BUNAnLocal, BM, 8 monthsCT, SCR, 112 months
 83P2AFLocal, Skin 6 monthsCT, SCR, 125 months
 96A2BFNAnLocal, 14 monthsCTCR, 88 months
109P2BFNAnLocal, 13 monthsCTCR, 38 months
1110A2BFNAnB, BM, 6 monthsCT, RTLFU, 27 months
1210A2AFNTeLocal, 9 monthsRTUnknown
1313A2ALocal, 15 monthsCTCR, 55 months
1414Neck2BFAnLocal, 1 monthCT, SCR, 89 months
1527A2AUETeLocal, B, Lung, 2 monthsCT, SDOD, 27months
1642T2AUNTeLocal, BM, B, 4 monthsCT, SDOD, 46 months
1743A2BUETeLocal, 1 monthCT, SDOD, 57 months
1847T2BFNLocal, BM, 3 monthsCT, SDOD, 19 months
1955A2BUNLocal, 36 monthsCT, SDOD, 77 months
2065A2BUEDLocal, B, 5 monthsS, CTDOD, 32 months
2168T2AUNLocal, 26 monthsNoneCR
22100P2BUNDLocal, B, Liver, 92 monthsNoneLFU, 93 months

A=abdomen; An=aneuploid; B=bone; BM=bone marrow; CR=complete remission; CT=chemotherapy; D=diploid; DOD=dead of disease; E=elevated; F=favourable; LFU=lost to follow-up; N=normal; P=pelvis; RT=radiotherapy; S=surgery; T=thorax; Te=Tetraploid; U=unfavourable.

Prognostic factors

Analyses aimed at assessing the impact of potential prognostic factors on OS and RFS were limited by the small number of events. Among stage 1 patients, no analysis of OS was possible (three events). Regarding RFS, the only prognostic factor we identified was gender, with males relapsing more often than females (5-year RFS 92.0 vs 97.5%; P<0.05) (Table 5). Normal LDH serum levels were associated with greater RFS (95.6 vs 83.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.061). Among stage 2 patients, no noticeable differences in either OS or RFS were observed with regard to gender, age, lymph node infiltration, vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid urinary excretion, or DNA index (Table 5). Patients with unfavourable histopathologic features had significantly worse OS and RFS than those with favourable features (96.4 vs 75.9%, P<0.0004; and 85.5 vs 61.2%, P<0.0035, respectively) (Table 5). In addition, normal LDH serum levels were significantly associated with better OS and RFS (95.7 vs 50.0%; P<0.0001; 85.2 vs 62.5%; P=0.050, respectively) (Table 5).
Table 5

Five-year OS and RFS for stage 1 and stage 2 patients without MYCNA

  Stage 1
Stage 2
Characteristics Cases No. of deaths OS P-value No. of events RFS P-value Cases No. of deaths OS P-value No. of events RFS P-value
 288398.9 1694.3 123993.2 2282.8 
Gender       <0.05   0.79  0.16
 Male167   1392 61493.2 888.5 
 Female121   397.5 62593.4 1477.4 
               
Age (years)       0.91   0.07  0.90
 0–17185   1094.5 76396.0 1481.5 
 ⩾18103   694.1 47688.7 885.0 
               
Primary site       0.79   0.45  0.076
 Neck14   192.9 71100 271.4 
 Thorax65   395.4 43295.3 490.7 
 Abdomen197   1293.7 61689.6 1181.8 
 Pelvis12   0100 120100 566.7 
               
LN infiltration           0.50  0.79
 Absent0      53394.3 983.0 
 Present0      70692.4 1382.7 
               
Serum LDH       0.061   <0.0001  0.050
 Normal161   795.6 95595.7 1585.2 
 Increased12   283.3 8450 362.5 
 Missing115      20      
               
Urine VMA       0.44   0.20  0.87
 Normal118   595.8 32390.4 684.4 
 Increased57   492.8 40197.5 782.5 
 Missing113      51      
               
Urine HVA       0.28   0.31  0.39
 Normal108   496.3 36391.4 880.6 
 Increased52   492.1 35197.1 585.7 
 Missing128      52      
               
Histopathologic category       0.78   <0.0004  <0.0035
 Favourable191   1094.7 83396.4 1285.5 
 Unfavourable25   196 21675.9 961.2 
 Missing72      19      
               
DNA index       0.40   0.31  0.40
 Aneuploid90   792.2 47393.6 883 
 Di-tetraploid50   491.5 29485.9 779.3 
 Missing148      47      

HVA=homovanillic acid; LDH=lactate dehydrogenase; LN=lymph node; OS=overall survival; RFS=relapse-free survival; VMA=vanillylmandelic acid.

Stage 1 and 2 with MYCNA

Of the 427 children with localised resectable neuroblastoma who were evaluated for MYCN gene status, 16 (3.7%) had abnormal copy numbers of the gene, including 7 stage 1 and 9 stage 2 patients. Five of the seven stage 1 patients suffered relapses: four local and one both local and in the bone and bone marrow. Four of these five patients eventually died. Of the nine stage 2 patients who received upfront chemotherapy according to the guidelines of the individual participating institutions, three relapsed, all locally and at distant sites; two eventually died.

Discussion

This study focused on localised, resectable tumours and aimed at assessing whether surgery alone is an adequate and safe treatment for all stage 1 patients and for stage 2 patients without MYCNA (Rubie ). Overall, 411 out of 905 enrolled patients were classified as either INSS stage 1 or stage 2 without MYCNA. The 288 stage 1 patients in this series did very well and had an OS of 98.9%; this is in line with previous literature reports (De Bernardi ; Evans ; Kushner ; Alvarado ; Perez ), and confirms that neuroblastomas that are resected macroscopically and have normal MYCN status do not need adjuvant therapy and are commonly salvageable in the event of relapse. Indeed, only one of three deaths was due to disease progression, whereas the other two were related to treatment. Physicians should therefore avoid letting risks that are secondary to therapy exceed the risks related to this scarcely aggressive neoplasm. It is noteworthy that, of the 16 events recorded in these 288 stage 1 patients, all the 10 that occurred in infants did well, although 5 of them underwent observation only after the event had occurred. This fact was interpreted as the possible evolution towards stage 4S disease on the basis of the very young age (less than 6 months in 7 out of 10) and the sites of progressions (mainly the skin, bone marrow, and primary tumour). This is possibly the first observation of this type and may reflect the increased ability to detect stage 4S disease at an early phase, that is before the multifocal nature of the tumour has become evident. Unlike the other stage 1 patients, the seven with MYCNA who also underwent a wait-and-see strategy tended to have an unfavourable course; indeed, five of them relapsed and four eventually died, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be seriously considered for this rare population. A pooled analysis of existing evidence is warranted to clarify this issue. Of 123 stage 2 patients without MYCNA who were enrolled in this study and who underwent observation alone after surgery, 1 died of surgery-related complications and 22 relapsed, 8 of whom died. Relapses occurred locally in almost all cases, with associated metastatic spread in about half of them, thus resulting in an RFS rate of 82.8%. The risk of relapse was significantly greater in association with unfavourable histological features, confirming the findings of other authors (Perez ; Shimada ), and elevated LDH serum levels, although in the latter case the small number of events precludes firm conclusions about the prognostic significance of this parameter. However, at variance with previous reports, the risk of relapse did not correlate significantly with the age at diagnosis (De Bernardi ), regional lymph node infiltration (Ninane ), and DNA index (Bagatell ). These conflicting results may be accounted for by the small number of cases in the published series. Eight of the 22 stage 2 patients who relapsed died of disease, and the risk of progression and death was independent of the extent of relapse. Although the 5-year OS of 93.2% is in line with previous literature data (Matthay ; De Bernardi ; Perez ), it indicates that, despite having a normal MYCN gene status, a non-negligible proportion of these patients are candidates for a worrisome clinical course and may die of disease progression. Clearly, further biological studies are needed to identify which patients might benefit from adjuvant treatment. Interestingly, one-third of the nine stage 2 patients who had MYCNA and therefore received adjuvant therapy on an institutional basis relapsed and only two eventually died (22%), as against the four deaths (57%) observed among the seven stage 1 patients with MYCNA who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Although the small number of patients available for these analyses precludes any firm conclusions, our findings underline the need for studies aimed at evaluating the hypothesis that immediate postoperative chemotherapy may effectively act against the minimal post-surgical tumour residue in this particular setting.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Epidural compression in neuroblastoma: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

Authors:  Bruno De Bernardi; Walentyna Balwierz; Joanna Bejent; Susan L Cohn; Maria Luisa Garrè; Tomoko Iehara; Dominique Plantaz; Thorsten Simon; Paola Angelini; Armando Cama; Wendy B London; Kim Kramer; Howard M Katzenstein; Paolo Tortori-Donati; Andrea Rossi; Giulio J D'Angio; Audrey E Evans
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 8.679

2.  Surgical risk factors in primary surgery for localized neuroblastoma: the LNESG1 study of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group.

Authors:  Giovanni Cecchetto; Veronique Mosseri; Bruno De Bernardi; Pierre Helardot; Tom Monclair; Elisa Costa; Ernst Horcher; Sylvia Neuenschwander; Paolo Tomà; Antonino Rizzo; Jean Michon; Keith Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Biologic variables in the outcome of stages I and II neuroblastoma treated with surgery as primary therapy: a children's cancer group study.

Authors:  C A Perez; K K Matthay; J B Atkinson; R C Seeger; H Shimada; G M Haase; D O Stram; R B Gerbing; J N Lukens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  International neuroblastoma pathology classification for prognostic evaluation of patients with peripheral neuroblastic tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

Authors:  H Shimada; S Umehara; Y Monobe; Y Hachitanda; A Nakagawa; S Goto; R B Gerbing; D O Stram; J N Lukens; K K Matthay
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system).

Authors:  H Shimada; I M Ambros; L P Dehner; J Hata; V V Joshi; B Roald; D O Stram; R B Gerbing; J N Lukens; K K Matthay; R P Castleberry
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  N-Myc gene amplification is a major prognostic factor in localized neuroblastoma: results of the French NBL 90 study. Neuroblastoma Study Group of the Société Francaise d'Oncologie Pédiatrique.

Authors:  H Rubie; O Hartmann; J Michon; D Frappaz; C Coze; P Chastagner; M C Baranzelli; D Plantaz; H Avet-Loiseau; J Bénard; O Delattre; M Favrot; M C Peyroulet; A Thyss; Y Perel; C Bergeron; B Courbon-Collet; J P Vannier; J Lemerle; D Sommelet
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Outcomes of children with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma after treatment stratified by MYCN status and tumor cell ploidy.

Authors:  Rochelle Bagatell; Pavlina Rumcheva; Wendy B London; Susan L Cohn; A Thomas Look; Garrett M Brodeur; Christopher Frantz; Vijay Joshi; Paul Thorner; P V Rao; Robert Castleberry; Laura C Bowman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Staging of neuroblastoma at imaging: report of the radiology diagnostic oncology group.

Authors:  Marilyn J Siegel; Hemant Ishwaran; Barry D Fletcher; James S Meyer; Fredric A Hoffer; Diego Jaramillo; Ramiro J Hernandez; Susan E Roubal; Barry A Siegel; Daryl J Caudry; Barbara J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Localized unresectable neuroblastoma: results of treatment based on clinical prognostic factors.

Authors:  A Garaventa; L Boni; M S Lo Piccolo; G P Tonini; C Gambini; A Mancini; L Tonegatti; M Carli; L C di Montezemolo; A Di Cataldo; F Casale; K Mazzocco; G Cecchetto; A Rizzo; B Bernardi
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  The impact of surgical radicality on outcome in childhood neuroblastoma.

Authors:  D von Schweinitz; B Hero; F Berthold
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.191

View more
  33 in total

1.  Enhanced metastatic growth after local tumor resection in the presence of synchronous metastasis in a mouse allograft model of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Maho Inoue; Yoshiki Tsuchiya; Nobuya Koike; Yasuhiro Umemura; Hitoshi Inokawa; Yuichi Togashi; Junnosuke Maniwa; Mayumi Higashi; Shigehisa Fumino; Tatsuro Tajiri; Kazuhiro Yagita
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Disseminated injection of vincristine-loaded silk gel improves the suppression of neuroblastoma tumor growth.

Authors:  Jasmine Zeki; Jordan S Taylor; Burcin Yavuz; Jeannine Coburn; Naohiko Ikegaki; David L Kaplan; Bill Chiu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Minimal disease detection in peripheral blood and bone marrow from patients with non-metastatic neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Yania Yáñez; Elena Grau; Silvestre Oltra; Adela Cañete; Francisco Martínez; Carmen Orellana; Rosa Noguera; Sarai Palanca; Victoria Castel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Long-term side effects of radiotherapy for pediatric localized neuroblastoma : results from clinical trials NB90 and NB94.

Authors:  Anne Ducassou; Marion Gambart; Caroline Munzer; Laetitia Padovani; Christian Carrie; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Valérie Bernier-Chastagner; Charlotte Demoor; Line Claude; Sylvie Helfre; Stéphanie Bolle; Julie Leseur; Aymeri Huchet; Hervé Rubie; Dominique Valteau-Couanet; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Carole Coze; Anne-Sophie Defachelles; Aurélien Marabelle; Stéphane Ducassou; Christine Devalck; Virginie Gandemer; Martine Munzer; Anne Laprie
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting.

Authors:  Julie R Park; Rochelle Bagatell; Susan L Cohn; Andrew D Pearson; Judith G Villablanca; Frank Berthold; Susan Burchill; Ariane Boubaker; Kieran McHugh; Jed G Nuchtern; Wendy B London; Nita L Seibel; O Wolf Lindwasser; John M Maris; Penelope Brock; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Ruth Ladenstein; Katherine K Matthay; Dominique Valteau-Couanet
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Clinico-epidemiology of neuroblastoma in north east Egypt: A 5-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Youssef Al-Tonbary; Mohamed Badr; Ahmed Mansour; Usama El Safy; Shebl Saeed; Tamer Hassan; Rasha Elashery; Rofida Nofal; Ahmad Darwish
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Neuroblastoma: molecular pathogenesis and therapy.

Authors:  Chrystal U Louis; Jason M Shohet
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 13.739

8.  Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study.

Authors:  Joëlle Vermeulen; Katleen De Preter; Arlene Naranjo; Liesbeth Vercruysse; Nadine Van Roy; Jan Hellemans; Katrien Swerts; Sophie Bravo; Paola Scaruffi; Gian Paolo Tonini; Bruno De Bernardi; Rosa Noguera; Marta Piqueras; Adela Cañete; Victoria Castel; Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey; Olivier Delattre; Gudrun Schleiermacher; Jean Michon; Valérie Combaret; Matthias Fischer; André Oberthuer; Peter F Ambros; Klaus Beiske; Jean Bénard; Bárbara Marques; Hervé Rubie; Janice Kohler; Ulrike Pötschger; Ruth Ladenstein; Michael D Hogarty; Patrick McGrady; Wendy B London; Geneviève Laureys; Frank Speleman; Jo Vandesompele
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Genetic discoveries and treatment advances in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Rochelle Bagatell; Susan L Cohn
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.856

10.  A prospective study of expectant observation as primary therapy for neuroblastoma in young infants: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Jed G Nuchtern; Wendy B London; Carol E Barnewolt; Arlene Naranjo; Patrick W McGrady; James D Geiger; Lisa Diller; Mary Lou Schmidt; John M Maris; Susan L Cohn; Robert C Shamberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.