Literature DB >> 18766058

Use of buccal myomucosal flap in secondary cleft palate repair.

Andrew G N Robertson1, Darren J McKeown, Gustavo Bello-Rojas, Yeon-Jeen Chang, Amy Rogers, Barbara J Beal, Mark Blake, Ian T Jackson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the buccal myomucosal flap in secondary repairs of cleft palate.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients who underwent secondary palatoplasty between 1989 and 2004 in which a buccal myomucosal flap was used were reviewed retrospectively. All patients had undergone at least one previous attempted repair at other institutions. Indications for the secondary repair included velopharyngeal incompetence and/or oronasal fistula. Patients were evaluated preoperatively for oronasal fistula status, velopharyngeal competence, nasal resonance, speech quality, and nasal escape.
RESULTS: The buccal myomucosal flap was used in all patients. The patients' mean age was 8.5 years (range, 1 to 23 years). Correction was indicated in seven patients with velopharyngeal incompetence (32 percent), five patients with oronasal fistulas (23 percent), and 10 patients with both conditions (45 percent). Preoperative assessment revealed four patients (18 percent) with an associated syndrome, 17 of 20 patients with hyperresonance (85 percent), 16 of 20 patients with nasal escape (80 percent), and 12 of 20 patients with poor speech (60 percent). The buccal myomucosal flap technique was used alone in 50 percent of patients, six patients had a staged correction (27 percent) and five patients required multiple procedures (23 percent). All fistulas remained closed. Two patients showed mild velopharyngeal incompetence (p = 0.001) and two patients continued to display hyperresonance (p < 0.001). Speech quality improved to a good level in 17 patients (77 percent) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Palate re-repair combined with a buccal myomucosal flap, occasionally in conjunction with other techniques, is an effective method for correcting failed cleft palate repairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766058     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318182368e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  The Effectiveness of Palate Re-Repair for Treating Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nicole M Kurnik; Erica M Weidler; Kari M Lien; Kelly N Cordero; Jessica L Williams; M'hamed Temkit; Stephen P Beals; Davinder J Singh; Thomas J Sitzman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-02-19

2.  Five surgical maneuvers on nasal mucosa movement in cleft palate repair: A cadaver study.

Authors:  Dennis C Nguyen; Kamlesh B Patel; Rajiv P Parikh; Gary B Skolnick; Albert S Woo
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Rational and simplified nomenclature for buccinator myomucosal flaps.

Authors:  Olindo Massarelli; Luigi Angelo Vaira; Andrea Biglio; Roberta Gobbi; Pasquale Piombino; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-09-21

4.  The folded buccal musculomucosal flap for large palatal fistulae in cleft palate.

Authors:  Shinji Kobayashi; Toshihiko Fukawa; Takashi Hirakawa; Jiro Maegawa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-03-06

5.  Buccinator myomucosal flap for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate and/or lip.

Authors:  Rafael Denadai; Anelise Sabbag; Cassio Eduardo Raposo Amaral; João Carlos Pereira Filho; Mirian Hideko Nagae; Cesar Augusto Raposo Amaral
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.