Literature DB >> 18765611

How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high-yielding dairy cows?

J P Marden1, C Julien, V Monteils, E Auclair, R Moncoulon, C Bayourthe.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the capacity of 2 dietary feed additives, sodium bicarbonate and live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain Sc 47), in optimizing ruminal pH in dairy cows and to determine their modes of action. Three early lactating Holstein cows, fitted with ruminal cannulas, were allocated in a 3 x 3 Latin square design. They were given a total mixed ration as control diet (CD) at a daily feeding rate of 28.0 kg of dry matter (DM)/cow supplemented with 150 g/d of sodium bicarbonate (SBD) or 5 g/d of live yeast (YD) during a 21-d experimental period (14 d of diet adaptation, 4 consecutive days of measurement and sampling and 3 d of transition). The pH and redox potential (E(h)) were measured from 1 h before feeding to 8 h after feeding at 1-h intervals, and samples of ruminal fluid were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after feeding for the determination of volatile fatty acids and lactate concentrations. Total tract apparent digestibility of the diet was also determined. Ruminal pH fluctuated between 6.53 at feeding and 5.57 at 5 h postfeeding. Mean pH was greater with SBD (6.21) and YD (6.14) compared with CD (5.94), showing that both additives had a pH stabilization effect. The E(h) varied from -88 mV at 1 h before feeding to -165 mV at 1 h after feeding. Mean E(h) and Clark's Exponent (rH) were lower with YD (-149 mV and 7.31, respectively) than with SBD (-137 mV and 7.85, respectively) and CD (-115 mV and 8.05, respectively), indicating that the yeast strengthened the reducing power of the milieu. Total volatile fatty acids were greater in SBD (95.3 mM) and YD (99.4 mM) compared with CD (85.3 mM). Acetate concentration was greater in SBD (60.8 mM) and YD (59.1 mM) compared with CD (53.2 mM). Propionate concentration was greater in YD (25.8 mM) than in SBD (20.0 mM) and CD (18.0 mM). Butyrate remained constant between diets. Mean total lactate concentrations were 16.5, 12.2, and 5.4 mM for CD, SBD, and YD, respectively, with a 67% decrease with YD. Total tract organic matter digestibility was greater for YD (66.6%) compared with SBD (61.7%) and CD (62.2%). The neutral detergent fiber digestibility was greater with YD (41.6%) compared with SBD (34.3%) and CD (29.6%), whereas acid detergent fiber digestibility was greatest in YD (32.3%), intermediate in SBD (24.4%), and lowest in CD (18.1%). By inducing a lower ruminal E(h) and rH, live yeast prevented accumulation of lactate and allowed better fiber digestion, whereas sodium bicarbonate seemed to act only as an exogenous buffer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765611     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  14 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Probiotics on Dairy Production Efficiency.

Authors:  Kirankumar Nalla; Naresh Kumar Manda; Harmeet Singh Dhillon; Santosh R Kanade; Namita Rokana; Matthias Hess; Anil Kumar Puniya
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Performance of tropical dairy cows fed whole crop rice silage with varying levels of concentrate.

Authors:  Metha Wanapat; Sungchhang Kang; Pichad Khejornsart; Ruangyote Pilajun; Sadudee Wanapat
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Effects of inoculation of corn silage with Lactobacillus spp. or Saccharomyces cerevisiae alone or in combination on silage fermentation characteristics, nutrient digestibility, and growth performance of growing beef cattle.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Nair; Shanwei Xu; Brenda Smiley; Hee-Eun Yang; Tim A McAllister; Yuxi Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Evaluation of different inclusion levels of dry live yeast impacts on various rumen parameters and in situ digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber in growing and finishing beef cattle.

Authors:  Caitlyn M Cagle; Luiz Fernando D Batista; Robin C Anderson; Mozart A Fonseca; Maztt D Cravey; Christine Julien; Luis O Tedeschi
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  An Investigation into Rumen Fungal and Protozoal Diversity in Three Rumen Fractions, during High-Fiber or Grain-Induced Sub-Acute Ruminal Acidosis Conditions, with or without Active Dry Yeast Supplementation.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ishaq; Ousama AlZahal; Nicola Walker; Brian McBride
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review.

Authors:  Muhammed A Arowolo; Jianhua He
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-05-23

7.  The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle.

Authors:  Eric Pinloche; Neil McEwan; Jean-Philippe Marden; Corinne Bayourthe; Eric Auclair; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Response of primiparous and multiparous buffaloes to yeast culture supplementation during early and mid-lactation.

Authors:  Hanne H Hansen; Nasr E El-Bordeny; Hossam M Ebeid
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-08-18

9.  Ruminal pH pattern, fermentation characteristics and related bacteria in response to dietary live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation in beef cattle.

Authors:  Xiangfei Zhang; Xianwen Dong; Metha Wanapat; Ali Mujtaba Shah; Xiaolin Luo; Quanhui Peng; Kun Kang; Rui Hu; Jiuqiang Guan; Zhisheng Wang
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-08-25

10.  Pellets Inoculated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens H57 Modulates Diet Preference and Rumen Factors Associated with Appetite Regulation in Steers.

Authors:  Thi Thuy Ngo; Nguyen N Bang; Peter Dart; Matthew Callaghan; Athol Klieve; David McNeill
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.