Literature DB >> 18765602

Potential for estimation of body condition scores in dairy cattle from digital images.

J M Bewley1, A M Peacock, O Lewis, R E Boyce, D J Roberts, M P Coffey, S J Kenyon, M M Schutz.   

Abstract

Body condition scoring, an indirect measure of the level of subcutaneous fat in dairy cattle, has been widely adopted for research and field assessment or for management purposes on farms. The feasibility of utilizing digital images to determine body condition score (BCS) was assessed for lactating dairy cows at the Scottish Agricultural College Crichton Royal Farm. Two measures of BCS were obtained by using the primary systems utilized in the United Kingdom (UK-BCS) and the United States (USBCS). Means were 2.12 (+/-0.35) and 2.89 (+/-0.40), modes were 2.25 and 2.75, and ranges were 1.0 to 3.5 and 1.5 to 4.5 for the UKBCS (n = 2,346) and USBCS (n = 2,571), respectively. Up to 23 anatomical points were manually identified on images captured automatically as cows passed through a weigh station. Points around the hooks were easier to identify on images than points around pins and the tailhead. All identifiable points were used to define and formulate measures describing the cow's contour. For both BCS systems, hook angle, posterior hook angle, and tailhead depression were significant predictors of BCS. When the full data set testing only the angles around the hooks was used, 100% of predicted BCS were within 0.50 points of actual USBCS and 92.79% were within 0.25 points; and 99.87% of predicted BCS were within 0.50 points of actual UKBCS and 89.95% were within 0.25 points. In a reduced data set considering only observations in which the tailhead depression angle was available, adding the tailhead depression to models did not improve model predictions. The relationships of the calculated angles with USBCS were stronger than those with UKBCS. This research demonstrates the potential for using digital images for assessing BCS. Future efforts should explore ways to automate this process by using a larger number of animals to predict scores accurately for cows across all levels of body condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765602     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Accuracy of image analysis for linear zoometric measurements in dromedary camels.

Authors:  Djalel Eddine Gherissi; Ramzi Lamraoui; Faycel Chacha; Semir Bechir Suheil Gaouar
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 1.893

Review 2.  Precision Technologies to Address Dairy Cattle Welfare: Focus on Lameness, Mastitis and Body Condition.

Authors:  Severiano R Silva; José P Araujo; Cristina Guedes; Flávio Silva; Mariana Almeida; Joaquim L Cerqueira
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Feasibility of automated body trait determination using the SR4K time-of-flight camera in cow barns.

Authors:  Jennifer Salau; Jan H Haas; Wolfgang Junge; Ulrike Bauer; Jan Harms; Sascha Bieletzki
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-05-03

4.  Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?

Authors:  Poppy Gant; Shelley L Holden; Vincent Biourge; Alexander J German
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 5.  Reproductive management in dairy cows - the future.

Authors:  Mark A Crowe; Miel Hostens; Geert Opsomer
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.146

6.  Body Condition Score Estimation Based on Regression Analysis Using a 3D Camera.

Authors:  Thi Thi Zin; Pann Thinzar Seint; Pyke Tin; Yoichiro Horii; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Welfare Health and Productivity in Commercial Pig Herds.

Authors:  Przemysław Racewicz; Agnieszka Ludwiczak; Ewa Skrzypczak; Joanna Składanowska-Baryza; Hanna Biesiada; Tomasz Nowak; Sebastian Nowaczewski; Maciej Zaborowicz; Marek Stanisz; Piotr Ślósarz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Automated monitoring of dairy cow body condition, mobility and weight using a single 3D video capture device.

Authors:  M F Hansen; M L Smith; L N Smith; K Abdul Jabbar; D Forbes
Journal:  Comput Ind       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.635

9.  Evaluation of somatotype in the reticulated giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis reticulata) using three-dimensional laser measurement.

Authors:  Nobuhide Kido; Sohei Tanaka; Tomoko Omiya; Yuko Wada; Mina Shigenari; Takanori Munakata; Masaki Ogawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 10.  Image Analysis and Computer Vision Applications in Animal Sciences: An Overview.

Authors:  Arthur Francisco Araújo Fernandes; João Ricardo Rebouças Dórea; Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães Rosa
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.