Literature DB >> 18765539

Thymidine selectively enhances growth suppressive effects of camptothecin/irinotecan in MSI+ cells and tumors containing a mutation of MRE11.

Rene Rodriguez1, Lasse Tengbjerg Hansen, Geraldine Phear, Jennifer Scorah, Mogens Spang-Thomsen, Angela Cox, Thomas Helleday, Mark Meuth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: DNA synthesis inhibitors and damaging agents are widely used in cancer therapy; however, sensitivity of tumors to such agents is highly variable. The response of tumor cells in culture to these agents is strongly influenced by the status of DNA damage response pathways. Here, we attempt to exploit the altered response of mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient colon cancer cells and tumors to camptothecin or irinotecan and thymidine by combining them to improve therapeutic response. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A panel of colon cancer cell lines was assayed for response to camptothecin-thymidine combinations by measuring colony formation, cell cycle distribution, and senescence. Cell strains defective in p53, p21, or Mre11 were used in these assays to investigate the role of these cell cycle regulators. The in vivo antitumor response of xenografts to irinotecan and thymidine combinations was assessed in nude mice.
RESULTS: Camptothecin-thymidine combinations suppress colony formation of MMR-deficient tumor cells 10- to 3,000-fold relative to that obtained with camptothecin alone and significantly reduce the concentrations of the agents required to induce late S/G(2) arrest and senescence. Sensitivity is not a direct result of MMR, p53, or p21 status. However MMR-deficient cell lines containing an intronic frameshift mutation of MRE11 show greatest sensitivity to these agents. Increased sensitivity to this combination is also evident in vivo as thymidine enhances irinotecan-induced growth suppression of MMR-deficient tumors carrying the MRE11 mutation in mouse xenografts.
CONCLUSION: Irinotecan-thymidine combinations may be particularly effective when targeted to MSI+ tumors containing this readily detectable MRE11 mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765539     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

1.  Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Kaori Shima; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Nadine J McCleary; Kimmie Ng; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Paul Schaefer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B Benson; Donna Spiegelman; Richard M Goldberg; Monica M Bertagnolli; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  MSH3 mediates sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.

Authors:  Masanobu Takahashi; Minoru Koi; Francesc Balaguer; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Molecular and prognostic heterogeneity of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: from molecular oncogenic mechanisms to clinical implications.

Authors:  Aziz Zaanan; Katy Meunier; Fatiha Sangar; Jean-François Fléjou; Françoise Praz
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 5.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer-the stable evidence.

Authors:  Eduardo Vilar; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Prognostic and predictive impact of DNA mismatch repair in the management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Zhineng Jayson Yang
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 7.  Causal link between microsatellite instability and hMRE11 dysfunction in human cancers.

Authors:  Xiling Wu; Yang Xu; Weihang Chai; Chengtao Her
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 8.  Molecular dissection of microsatellite instable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eduardo Vilar; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  KRAS mutation and microsatellite instability: two genetic markers of early tumor development that influence the prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Garrett M Nash; Mark Gimbel; Alfred M Cohen; Zhao-Shi Zeng; Mackevin I Ndubuisi; Daniel R Nathanson; Jurg Ott; Francis Barany; Philip B Paty
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer in the era of personalized treatment.

Authors:  Madeleine Hewish; Christopher J Lord; Sarah A Martin; David Cunningham; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.