Literature DB >> 18765536

Inhibition of glioblastoma growth in a highly invasive nude mouse model can be achieved by targeting epidermal growth factor receptor but not vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2.

Tobias Martens1, Yvonne Laabs, Hauke S Günther, Dirk Kemming, Zhenping Zhu, Larry Witte, Christian Hagel, Manfred Westphal, Katrin Lamszus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Major shortcomings of traditional mouse models based on xenografted human glioblastoma cell lines are that tumor cells do not invade and that genetic alterations, such as amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, are not maintained. Such models are thus of limited value for preclinical studies. We established a highly invasive model to evaluate the effect of antibodies against EGFR (cetuximab) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (antibody DC101). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: After short-term culture, glioblastoma spheroids were implanted into the brains of nude mice. Animals were treated either i.c. with cetuximab or i.p. with DC101. Tumor burden was determined histologically using image analysis of 36 different landmark points on serial brain sections.
RESULTS: Invasive xenografts were obtained from nine different glioblastomas. Three of seven cases treated with cetuximab responded with significant tumor growth inhibition, whereas four did not. All responsive tumors were derived from glioblastomas exhibiting EGFR amplification and expression of the truncated EGFRvIII variant, which were maintained in the xenografts. All nonresponsive tumors lacked EGFR amplification and EGFRvIII expression. The proportion of apoptotic cells was increased, whereas proliferation and invasion were decreased in responsive tumors. None of four xenograft cases treated with DC101 responded to treatment, and the diffusely invading tumors grew independent of angiogenesis.
CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of glioblastoma growth and invasion can be achieved using i.c. delivery of an anti-EGFR antibody, but tumor response depends on the presence of amplified and/or mutated EGFR. Antiangiogenic treatment with DC101 is not effective against diffusely invading tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765536     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  44 in total

1.  Cells with intense EGFR staining and a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio are specific for infiltrative glioma: a useful marker in neuropathological practice.

Authors:  Fanny Burel-Vandenbos; Laurent Turchi; Maxime Benchetrit; Eric Fontas; Zoe Pedeutour; Valérie Rigau; Fabien Almairac; Damien Ambrosetti; Jean-François Michiels; Thierry Virolle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway are differentially associated with the dichotomous regulation of glioblastoma cell migration versus proliferation.

Authors:  Annegret Kathagen-Buhmann; Alexander Schulte; Jonathan Weller; Mareike Holz; Christel Herold-Mende; Rainer Glass; Katrin Lamszus
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  The neurobiology of gliomas: from cell biology to the development of therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Manfred Westphal; Katrin Lamszus
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Will kinase inhibitors make it as glioblastoma drugs?

Authors:  Ingo K Mellinghoff; Nikolaus Schultz; Paul S Mischel; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 5.  Targeted therapy for malignant glioma patients: lessons learned and the road ahead.

Authors:  Tiffany T Huang; Shawn M Sarkaria; Timothy F Cloughesy; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Blockade of transforming growth factor-β signaling enhances oncolytic herpes simplex virus efficacy in patient-derived recurrent glioblastoma models.

Authors:  Shinichi Esaki; Fares Nigim; Esther Moon; Samantha Luk; Juri Kiyokawa; William Curry; Daniel P Cahill; Andrew S Chi; A John Iafrate; Robert L Martuza; Samuel D Rabkin; Hiroaki Wakimoto
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Complex oncogenic signaling networks regulate brain tumor-initiating cells and their progenies: pivotal roles of wild-type EGFR, EGFRvIII mutant and hedgehog cascades and novel multitargeted therapies.

Authors:  Murielle Mimeault; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.508

Review 8.  Concerns about anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Joost J C Verhoeff; Olaf van Tellingen; An Claes; Lukas J A Stalpers; Myra E van Linde; Dirk J Richel; William P J Leenders; Wouter R van Furth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Selective regain of egfr gene copies in CD44+/CD24-/low breast cancer cellular model MDA-MB-468.

Authors:  Konstantin Agelopoulos; Burkhard Greve; Hartmut Schmidt; Heike Pospisil; Stefan Kurtz; Kai Bartkowiak; Antje Andreas; Marek Wieczorek; Eberhard Korsching; Horst Buerger; Burkhard Brandt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Fyn and SRC are effectors of oncogenic epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Kan V Lu; Shaojun Zhu; Anna Cvrljevic; Tiffany T Huang; Shawn Sarkaria; David Ahkavan; Julie Dang; Eduard B Dinca; Seema B Plaisier; Isaac Oderberg; Yohan Lee; Zugen Chen; Jeremy S Caldwell; Yongmin Xie; Joseph A Loo; David Seligson; Arnab Chakravari; Francis Y Lee; Roberto Weinmann; Timothy F Cloughesy; Stanley F Nelson; Gabriele Bergers; Thomas Graeber; Frank B Furnari; C David James; Webster K Cavenee; Terrance G Johns; Paul S Mischel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.