Literature DB >> 18765393

Dose effect of clopidogrel reloading in patients already on 75-mg maintenance dose: the Reload with Clopidogrel Before Coronary Angioplasty in Subjects Treated Long Term with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (RELOAD) study.

Jean-Philippe Collet1, Johanne Silvain, Antoine Landivier, Marie-Laure Tanguy, Guillaume Cayla, Anne Bellemain, Nicolas Vignolles, Sophie Gallier, Farzin Beygui, Ana Pena, Gilles Montalescot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel loading has mostly been studied in clopidogrel-naïve patients. Whether clopidogrel-treated patients readmitted for an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention can benefit from a new load of clopidogrel and at what dose remain unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of 3 different strategies of administration of a loading dose of 900 mg clopidogrel in patients already treated with a maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel for at least 7 days on residual platelet aggregation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients treated long term by clopidogrel 75 mg/d were assigned to receive a first loading dose of 300, 600, or 900 mg clopidogrel and 4 hours later a second loading dose of 600, 300, or 0 mg, respectively, to achieve a total loading dose of 900 mg in all patients. Platelet aggregation was evaluated at baseline, at 4 hours after the initial load (and before second load), and at 24 hours using light transmission aggregometry with 20 micromol ADP and the point-of-care assay VerifyNow P2Y(12). The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the inhibition (relative change) of residual platelet aggregation (percentage of IRPA) between 600- and 900-mg first loading at 4 hours. IRPA at 24 hours also was evaluated as a secondary objective, as well as the rate of suboptimal response at 4 hours defined as IRPA <10%. We included 166 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (n=80, 48%) or stable coronary artery disease (n=86, 52%). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 dose groups. A significant stepwise increase was found in percentage IRPA assessed at 4 hours in patients initially assigned to 300 versus 600 versus 900 mg (30.7% versus 40.3% versus 64.0%, respectively; P=0.0024). The difference in percentage IRPA at 4 hours was not significant between 300 and 600 mg but was significant between 600 and 900 mg and between 300 and 900 mg. Percentage IRPA assessed at 24 hours when all patients had received 900 mg did not differ between the 3 loading regimens. The rates of suboptimal response (IRPA <10% at 4 hours) were 23.6%, 20.4%, and 5.3% with 300, 600, and 900 mg, respectively (P=0.02 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated long term with 75 mg clopidogrel, a new loading dose of 900 mg improves IRPA and reduces poor and/or slow response to clopidogrel significantly more than that obtained with 300 or 600 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765393     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.776757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  10 in total

Review 1.  Optimization of Antiplatelet Therapy in STEMI.

Authors:  Abhishek Sinha; Kush Agrawal; Rahul Sakhuja
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 2.  Contemporary issues on clopidogrel therapy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Patti; Germano Di Sciascio
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Genotypic and phenotypic assessment of platelet function and response to P2Y12 antagonists.

Authors:  Axel de Labriolle; Jean Philippe Doazan; Gilles Lemesle; Laurent Bonello
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  The current state of endovascular therapy in the evaluation and management of renovascular disease.

Authors:  Praveen R Anchala; Scott A Resnick
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Prasugrel but not high dose clopidogrel overcomes the lansoprazole neutralizing effect of P2Y12 inhibition: Results of the randomized DOSAPI study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Collet; Jean-Sébastien Hulot; Jérémie Abtan; Ghalia Anzaha; Mathieu Kerneis; Johanne Silvain; Guillaume Cayla; Stephen A O'Connor; Olivier Barthélémy; Farzin Beygui; Sophie Galier; Delphine Brugier; Eric J Stanek; Scott L Charland; Vanessa Gallois; Gilles Montalescot
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  A new oral antiplatelet agent with potent antithrombotic properties: comparison of DZ-697b with clopidogrel a randomised phase I study.

Authors:  M Urooj Zafar; Borja Ibáñez; Brian G Choi; David A Vorchheimer; Antonio Piñero; Xiaoping Jin; Raman K Sharma; Juan J Badimon
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  St. John's Wort in patients non-responders to clopidogrel undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center randomized open-label trial (St. John's Trial).

Authors:  Catalina Trana; Gabor Toth; William Wijns; Emanuele Barbato
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Tailored antiplatelet therapy can overcome clopidogrel and aspirin resistance--the BOchum CLopidogrel and Aspirin Plan (BOCLA-Plan) to improve antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Horst Neubauer; Andreas F C Kaiser; Heinz G Endres; Jan C Krüger; Andreas Engelhardt; Sebastian Lask; Fenena Pepinghege; Andreas Kusber; Andreas Mügge
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Use of clopidogrel in the reduction of myocardial damage during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Arijit Dasgupta; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-04-08

10.  Clinical safety profile of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in 1208 patients: Real world evidence.

Authors:  Viveka Kumar; Vivek Kumar; Kajal Kumari; K K Talwar; Divya Prasad; Sunil Agarwal; M S Yadav; Hamed Bashir; Suman Jatain; S K Gupta
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2018-06-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.