Literature DB >> 18765323

Failure to rescue in the surgical oncology population: implications for nursing and quality improvement.

Christopher R Friese1, Linda H Aiken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the frequency, type, and correlates of postoperative complications for surgical patients with cancer to illustrate practical application of the failure to rescue concept in oncology nursing practice.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of inpatient claims.
SETTING: Data obtained from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council were linked with data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry. SAMPLE: 24,618 patients with solid tumors hospitalized for tumor-directed surgery in 164 acute care hospitals from 1998-1999.
METHODS: Frequency distributions examined the incidence of each complication, the proportion of patients who died with the complication, and complication frequency by tumor type. Chi-square tests compared the frequency of complications for patients who were admitted routinely or via the emergency department. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: 30-day mortality, postoperative complications, and tumor type.
FINDINGS: The most frequent complication in the sample was gastrointestinal bleeding (13.2%); however, 37.1% of patients who died had respiratory compromise as a complication. Admission through the emergency department was significantly associated with experiencing a complication (71.9% versus 43.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatable but serious postoperative complications are frequent and can be fatal in the surgical oncology population. Complication frequency and fatality vary significantly by cancer type. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The complications studied are detectable by nurses and can be managed successfully with timely intervention. Recognition of complications at an early stage and evidence-based management may assist nurses in patient rescue and, ultimately, improve quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765323      PMCID: PMC2562164          DOI: 10.1188/08.ONF.779-785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  38 in total

1.  Nursing unit characteristics and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne Mulvey Boyle
Journal:  Nurs Econ       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.085

Review 2.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; Nancy J O Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Advanced practice nursing outcomes: a review of selected empirical literature.

Authors:  Regina S Cunningham
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.

Authors:  L L Leape; T A Brennan; N Laird; A G Lawthers; A R Localio; B A Barnes; L Hebert; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Assessing hospital-associated deaths from discharge data. The role of length of stay and comorbidities.

Authors:  S F Jencks; D K Williams; T L Kay
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery. A study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue.

Authors:  J H Silber; S V Williams; H Krakauer; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study.

Authors:  Emily V A Finlayson; Philip P Goodney; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

8.  Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality.

Authors:  Linda H Aiken; Sean P Clarke; Robyn B Cheung; Douglas M Sloane; Jeffrey H Silber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  J H Silber; P R Rosenbaum; J S Schwartz; R N Ross; S V Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Differences among hospitals in Medicare patient mortality.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R E Park; K N Lohr; J Keesey; R H Brook
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Business Case for Magnet ® Designation : Using Data to Support Strategy.

Authors:  Karen Neil Drenkard
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.806

2.  Evaluation of user interface and workflow design of a bedside nursing clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Michael Juntao Yuan; George Mike Finley; Ju Long; Christy Mills; Ron Kim Johnson
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-01-31

3.  Application of gene expression programming and neural networks to predict adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Maciej Kusy; Bogdan Obrzut; Jacek Kluska
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.602

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.