Literature DB >> 18765008

Vitrification with DMSO protects embryo membrane integrity better than solutions without DMSO.

A-J Kartberg1, F Hambiliki, T Arvidsson, A Stavreus-Evers, P Svalander.   

Abstract

Vitrification has become common for cryopreservation of embryos. However, the most optimal protocol for vitrification is still to be found. Two vitrification protocols with similar osmolarities were compared: Protocol A, containing dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), propane-2-diol, and ethylene glycol, and Protocol B, containing propane-2-diol and ethylene glycol. Viability and the importance of specific incubation times for early embryo recovery, survival, and cleavage were studied. For assessment of cryodamage, embryos were labelled with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated annexin V and propidium iodide. Vitrification studies on early mouse embryos were followed up with studies on human embryos. The two vitrification protocols did not differ in embryo survival rates and were equally efficient in both mouse and human embryo models. Morphological assessment of embryos directly after vitrification was not a useful tool for assessing survival in this study. Extended exposure of embryos with both vitrification protocols showed that the DMSO-containing vitrification solutions did not lead to cell membrane damage and death as quickly as the DMSO-free vitrification solutions. To assess embryo viability, the authors recommend that vitrification of early embryos should be combined with extended culture and assessment of normal blastocyst development before transferring to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765008     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60221-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  8 in total

1.  Vitrification of canine cumulus-oocyte complexes in DAP213 with a cryotop holder.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Abe; Tomoyoshi Asano; Mohammed Ali; Hiroshi Suzuki
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-02

2.  Mouse oocyte vitrification with and without dimethyl sulfoxide: influence on cryo-survival, development, and maternal imprinted gene expression.

Authors:  Clementina Cantatore; Jenny S George; Raffaella Depalo; Giuseppe D'Amato; Molly Moravek; Gary D Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Mouse Oocytes and Embryos Cryotop-vitrification Using Low Concentrated Solutions: Effects on Meiotic Spindle, Genetic Material Array and Developmental Ability.

Authors:  Sahar Almasi Turk; Amrollah Roozbehi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.699

4.  A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos.

Authors:  Giovanna Fasano; Nicolas Fontenelle; Anne-Sophie Vannin; Jamila Biramane; Fabienne Devreker; Yvon Englert; Anne Delbaere
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Mouse Oocytes and Embryos Cryotop-vitrification Using Low Concentrated Solutions: Effects on Meiotic Spindle, Genetic Material Array and Developmental Ability.

Authors:  Sahar Almasi Turk; Amrollah Roozbehi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  DMSO cryopreservation is the method of choice to preserve cells for droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing.

Authors:  Christian T Wohnhaas; Germán G Leparc; Francesc Fernandez-Albert; David Kind; Florian Gantner; Coralie Viollet; Tobias Hildebrandt; Patrick Baum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Apoptotic cells in mouse blastocysts are eliminated by neighbouring blastomeres.

Authors:  Jozef Pisko; Alexandra Špirková; Štefan Čikoš; Lucia Olexiková; Veronika Kovaříková; Zuzana Šefčíková; Dušan Fabian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Vitrification within a nanoliter volume: oocyte and embryo cryopreservation within a 3D photopolymerized device.

Authors:  Suliman H Yagoub; Megan Lim; Tiffany C Y Tan; Darren J X Chow; Kishan Dholakia; Brant C Gibson; Jeremy G Thompson; Kylie R Dunning
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.357

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.