Literature DB >> 18764998

Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery.

Gere S diZerega1, Togas Tulandi.   

Abstract

Important progress has been made in the field of post-surgical adhesion prevention with the development of consensus statements in gynaecology from the United Kingdom, Germany, the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy, Call for Action in Colorectal Surgery and a recent Technical Bulletin from The Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. These reports suggest that the application of adhesion reduction devices together with the use of microsurgical principles reduces the formation of post-operative adhesions. This commentary provides additional information to assist gynaecologists in making surgical decisions. However, variation in adhesion classifications, mode of device application, lack of uniformity in surgical approaches and variations in interpretation of results make comparative assessment of the efficacy of adhesion reduction devices and surgical techniques difficult. Considering the choice of an adhesion-reduction device, one has to evaluate the cost and its clinical impact carefully. This is particularly important if one were to support routine, prophylactic use of adhesion-reduction devices. Healthcare providers should take into account the needs of individual patients, available resources, and institutional or clinical practice limitations. Good surgical technique and perhaps the use of approved devices for adhesion reduction would give patients the best chance to benefit from reproductive and gynaecological surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18764998     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60211-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The inpatient burden of abdominal and gynecological adhesiolysis in the US.

Authors:  Vanja Sikirica; Bela Bapat; Sean D Candrilli; Keith L Davis; Malcolm Wilson; Alan Johns
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Expression of CD68 positive macrophages in the use of different barrier materials to prevent peritoneal adhesions-an animal study.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Andreas Mamilos; Christine Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; Helmut Hierlemann; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Peritoneal full-conditioning reduces postoperative adhesions and pain: a randomised controlled trial in deep endometriosis surgery.

Authors:  Philippe R Koninckx; Roberta Corona; Dirk Timmerman; Jasper Verguts; Leila Adamyan
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 4.234

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.