Katharine M Benedict1, Paul S Morley, David C Van Metre. 1. Animal Population Health Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-678, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize biosecurity and infection control practices at veterinary teaching hospitals located at institutions accredited by the AVMA. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. POPULATION: 50 biosecurity experts at 38 veterinary teaching hospitals. PROCEDURES: Telephone interviews were conducted between July 2006 and July 2007, and questions were asked regarding policies for hygiene, surveillance, patient contact, education, and awareness. Respondents were also asked their opinion regarding the rigor of their programs. RESULTS: 31 of 38 (82%) hospitals reported outbreaks of nosocomial infection during the 5 years prior to the interview, 17 (45%) reported > 1 outbreak, 22 (58%) had restricted patient admissions to aid mitigation, and 12 (32%) had completely closed sections of the facility to control disease spread. Nineteen (50%) hospitals reported that zoonotic infections had occurred during the 2 years prior to the interview. Only 16 (42%) hospitals required personnel to complete a biosecurity training program, but 20 of the 50 (40%) respondents indicated that they believed their hospitals ranked among the top 10% in regard to rigor of infection control efforts. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that differences existed among infection control programs at these institutions. Perceptions of experts regarding program rigor appeared to be skewed, possibly because of a lack of published data characterizing programs at other institutions. Results may provide a stimulus for hospital administrators to better optimize biosecurity and infection control programs at their hospitals and thereby optimize patient care.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize biosecurity and infection control practices at veterinary teaching hospitals located at institutions accredited by the AVMA. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. POPULATION: 50 biosecurity experts at 38 veterinary teaching hospitals. PROCEDURES: Telephone interviews were conducted between July 2006 and July 2007, and questions were asked regarding policies for hygiene, surveillance, patient contact, education, and awareness. Respondents were also asked their opinion regarding the rigor of their programs. RESULTS: 31 of 38 (82%) hospitals reported outbreaks of nosocomial infection during the 5 years prior to the interview, 17 (45%) reported > 1 outbreak, 22 (58%) had restricted patient admissions to aid mitigation, and 12 (32%) had completely closed sections of the facility to control disease spread. Nineteen (50%) hospitals reported that zoonotic infections had occurred during the 2 years prior to the interview. Only 16 (42%) hospitals required personnel to complete a biosecurity training program, but 20 of the 50 (40%) respondents indicated that they believed their hospitals ranked among the top 10% in regard to rigor of infection control efforts. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that differences existed among infection control programs at these institutions. Perceptions of experts regarding program rigor appeared to be skewed, possibly because of a lack of published data characterizing programs at other institutions. Results may provide a stimulus for hospital administrators to better optimize biosecurity and infection control programs at their hospitals and thereby optimize patient care.
Authors: Armando E Hoet; Amanda Johnson; Rocio C Nava-Hoet; Shane Bateman; Andrew Hillier; John Dyce; Wondwossen A Gebreyes; Thomas E Wittum Journal: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 2.133
Authors: Joany van Balen; Christina Kelley; Rocio C Nava-Hoet; Shane Bateman; Andrew Hillier; Jonathan Dyce; Thomas E Wittum; Armando E Hoet Journal: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 2.133