Literature DB >> 18764104

Order alphas4 QCD corrections to Z and tau decays.

P A Baikov1, K G Chetyrkin, J H Kühn.   

Abstract

Using recently developed methods for the evaluation of five-loop amplitudes in perturbative QCD, corrections of order alphas4 for the nonsinglet part of the cross section for electron-positron annihilation into hadrons and for the decay rates of the Z boson and the tau lepton into hadrons are evaluated. The new terms lead to a significant stabilization of the perturbative series, to a reduction of the theory uncertainly in the strong coupling constant alphas, as extracted from these measurements, and to a small shift of the central value, moving the two central values closer together. The agreement between two values of alphas measured at vastly different energies constitutes a striking test of asymptotic freedom. Combining the results from Z and tau decays we find alphas(MZ)=0.1198+/-0.0015 as one of the most precise and presently only result for the strong coupling constant in order alphas4.

Year:  2008        PMID: 18764104     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.012002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev Lett        ISSN: 0031-9007            Impact factor:   9.161


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics: Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG).

Authors:  S Aoki; Y Aoki; D Bečirević; C Bernard; T Blum; G Colangelo; M Della Morte; P Dimopoulos; S Dürr; H Fukaya; M Golterman; Steven Gottlieb; S Hashimoto; U M Heller; R Horsley; A Jüttner; T Kaneko; L Lellouch; H Leutwyler; C-J D Lin; V Lubicz; E Lunghi; R Mawhinney; T Onogi; C Pena; C T Sachrajda; S R Sharpe; S Simula; R Sommer; A Vladikas; U Wenger; H Wittig
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.590

Review 2.  Physics at the [Formula: see text] linear collider.

Authors:  G Moortgat-Pick; H Baer; M Battaglia; G Belanger; K Fujii; J Kalinowski; S Heinemeyer; Y Kiyo; K Olive; F Simon; P Uwer; D Wackeroth; P M Zerwas; A Arbey; M Asano; J Bagger; P Bechtle; A Bharucha; J Brau; F Brümmer; S Y Choi; A Denner; K Desch; S Dittmaier; U Ellwanger; C Englert; A Freitas; I Ginzburg; S Godfrey; N Greiner; C Grojean; M Grünewald; J Heisig; A Höcker; S Kanemura; K Kawagoe; R Kogler; M Krawczyk; A S Kronfeld; J Kroseberg; S Liebler; J List; F Mahmoudi; Y Mambrini; S Matsumoto; J Mnich; K Mönig; M M Mühlleitner; R Pöschl; W Porod; S Porto; K Rolbiecki; M Schmitt; P Serpico; M Stanitzki; O Stål; T Stefaniak; D Stöckinger; G Weiglein; G W Wilson; L Zeune; F Moortgat; S Xella; J Bagger; J Brau; J Ellis; K Kawagoe; S Komamiya; A S Kronfeld; J Mnich; M Peskin; D Schlatter; A Wagner; H Yamamoto
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.590

3.  Constraints on the [Formula: see text] form factor from analyticity and unitarity.

Authors:  B Ananthanarayan; I Caprini; B Kubis
Journal:  Eur Phys J C Part Fields       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.590

Review 4.  On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic tau decays.

Authors:  André H Hoang; Christoph Regner
Journal:  Eur Phys J Spec Top       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 2.707

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.