Literature DB >> 1876406

[Mid- to long-term results after treatment of 118 cases of periprosthetic infections after knee joint replacement using one-stage exchange surgery].

G von Foerster1, D Klüber, U Käbler.   

Abstract

From 1976 to 1985, 157 periprosthetic infections after knee arthroplasty were treated surgically at the ENDO-Klinik in Hamburg. Of these, 118 cases underwent one-stage revision arthroplasty using specific antibiotic-loaded cement; 104 were available for analysis after a postoperative follow-up period of 5-15 years. Seventy-six cases were cured as a result of this single operation. This number was increased to 84 by a repeated operation in cases that had failed to respond to therapy. In 20 cases one-stage revision arthroplasty failed in the treatment of periprosthetic infections after replacement of the knee joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1876406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  26 in total

1.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Arthrodesis after total knee arthroplasty considering septic loosening as an example].

Authors:  T von Stein; H Gollwitzer; C Kruis; V Bühren
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].

Authors:  R Windhager; A Leithner; M Hochegger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Clinical faceoff: One- versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comment on: Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  Thorsten Gehrke; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Siraj A Sayeed; Qais Naziri; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges.

Authors:  P Massin; T Delory; L Lhotellier; G Pasquier; O Roche; A Cazenave; C Estellat; J Y Jenny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Direct exchange endoprosthetic reconstruction with tumour prosthesis for periprosthetic knee infection associated with segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Manjunath Ramappa; Ian McMurtry; Andrew Port
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-01-12

Review 10.  Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach.

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Ioannis Stogiannidis; Antti Malmivaara; Jorma Pajamäki; Timo Puolakka; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.