Literature DB >> 18763884

Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.

Laura Zamarian1, Hermann Sinz, Elisabeth Bonatti, Nadia Gamboz, Margarete Delazer.   

Abstract

Old adults have to face many situations that require important decisions. In the present investigation, the authors examined the effects of aging on both decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk. To this purpose, healthy young and old adults completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Probability-Associated Gambling task (PAG task). Old adults performed the PAG task as well as young adults, demonstrating ability to make decisions when full information about the problem situation, the options' probabilities and the associated gains and losses was given. Differently, old adults showed poor performance on the IGT relative to young adults, indicating difficulty in making advantageous decisions under ambiguous conditions. Indeed, in the IGT, participants are not aware of the rules for gains and losses and have to learn about the utility of their selections through experience. Results of our analyses point to the contribution of executive functions to all types of decisions. Our findings have also practical implications, suggesting that old people can make advantageous decisions when complete information about the decision situation is available. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18763884     DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  32 in total

1.  Adult age differences in learning on a sequentially cued prediction task.

Authors:  Kendra L Seaman; Darlene V Howard; James H Howard
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 2.  Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht; Agustín Ibáñez; María Roca; Teresa Torralva; Facundo Manes
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Diurnal cortisol rhythm is associated with increased risky decision-making in older adults.

Authors:  Joshua A Weller; Tony W Buchanan; Crystal Shackleford; Arielle Morganstern; Joshua J Hartman; Jonathan Yuska; Natalie L Denburg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions-a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences.

Authors:  Johannes Schiebener; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 5.  Decision-Making Competence in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Fanny Gaubert; Hanna Chainay
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker's executive functions.

Authors:  Johannes Schiebener; Elisa Wegmann; Mirko Pawlikowski; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-23

7.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 8.  The Affective Neuroscience of Aging.

Authors:  Mara Mather
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Risk approximation in decision making: approximative numeric abilities predict advantageous decisions under objective risk.

Authors:  Silke M Mueller; Johannes Schiebener; Margarete Delazer; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-01-22

10.  Risky decision-making in older adults without cognitive deficits: an fMRI study of VMPFC using the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Corianne Rogalsky; Christine Vidal; Xiangrui Li; Hanna Damasio
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 2.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.