Literature DB >> 18763314

Effects of different types of palatal lateral excisions on growth and development of maxilla and dental arch.

Jun Wu1, Qian Zheng, Bing Shi, Tian Meng, Yan Wang, Sheng Li, Li-shu Liao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effects of different types of palatal lateral excisions on the growth and development of the maxilla and dental arch, and to investigate the underlying mechanisms.
METHODS: A total of 112 3-week-old Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats were randomly divided into a control and 3 experimental groups: the mucoperiosteal denudation group, the mucosal flap excision group, and the periosteum excision group. In the experimental groups, bilateral mucoperiosteal, mucosal flap and periosteum were excised respectively in the lateral one half of the palate. Four rats in each group were randomly chosen for sacrifice every two weeks. The maxilla was dissected following the excision. The widths of the maxilla and dental arch were measured and the histological phenomena were investigated at different phases. At the same time, 12 animals in each group were sequentially injected with calcein every two weeks. Three animals in each group, whose fluorescent labeling was used, were sacrificed for investigating bone formation at Week 8 following injection.
RESULTS: (1) Each experimental group presented the constriction of the maxilla and dental arch. The upper first molars in the experimental groups inclined medially. The mucoperiosteal denudation group showed the largest degree of effect followed by the periosteum excision group. The indices of the mucosal flap excision group, which retained the structures of the periosteum layer, had the most approximate values to the control group; (2) Different histological changes among the experimental groups were detected. The fibers penetrated into the palatal bone as Sharpey's fibers in the mucoperiosteal denudation group. The pattern of bone deposition was the bundle type. Sharpey's fibers were not found in the mucosal flap and periosteum excision groups and the depositions of palatal bone were the lamellar type as those in the control group; (3) The rates of bone deposition in the experimental groups decreased compared with the control group. The rates in different phases were the most approximate values to those of the control group in the mucosal flap excision group, which has the same structure of periosteum as the control group.
CONCLUSION: There were different effects on the growth and development of the maxilla and dental arch in different types of palatal lateral excisions. Periosteum is important for bone formation and deposition pattern. The prevention of Sharpey's fibers forming and attaching to the palatine can effectively avert the following malformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18763314      PMCID: PMC2491694          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B0720015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  33 in total

1.  Sequential labelling of microdamage in bone using chelating agents.

Authors:  T C Lee; T L Arthur; L J Gibson; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Osteogenic potential of human periosteum-derived progenitor cells in PLGA scaffold using allogeneic serum.

Authors:  Yi-xiong Zheng; Jochen Ringe; Zhong Liang; Alexander Loch; Li Chen; Michael Sittinger
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  The osteoblast: a sophisticated fibroblast under central surveillance.

Authors:  P Ducy; T Schinke; G Karsenty
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Analysis of scar tissue distribution on rat palates: a laser Doppler flowmetric study.

Authors:  S Chu; H Ishikawa; T Kim; S Yoshida
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2000-09

5.  Constriction of the maxillary dental arch by mucoperiosteal denudation of the palate.

Authors:  Takenori Kim; Hiroyuki Ishikawa; Soowon Chu; Asako Handa; Junichiro Iida; Shigemitsu Yoshida
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2002-07

6.  A comparison of three methods of repairing the hard palate.

Authors:  R W Pigott; E H Albery; I S Hathorn; N E Atack; A Williams; K Harland; A Orlando; S Falder; B Coghlan
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2002-07

7.  Microcrack accumulation at different intervals during fatigue testing of compact bone.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Dento-alveolar development in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate.

Authors:  Makoto Noguchi; Yoshiyuki Suda; Shizuyo Ito; Gen iku Kohama
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Implantation of tissue-engineered mucosal substitutes in the dog palate.

Authors:  Ricardo Ophof; Jaap C Maltha; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Johannes W Von den Hoff
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The Leuven staged supraperiosteal retropositioning repair: long-term velopharyngeal function in non-syndromic cleft palate.

Authors:  V Vander Poorten; F Ostyn; W Van Kerckhoven; W Wellens; M Breuls; A Verdonck; C Vergalle; J H A Schoenaers
Journal:  B-ENT       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.