Literature DB >> 18763287

Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori serology in two peptic ulcer populations and in healthy controls.

Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo1, Roar Johnsen, Tor Jac Eide, Tore Gutteberg, Hanne Haukland Husum, Arthur Revhaug.   

Abstract

AIM: To estimate the test characteristics of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) serology and of C14-urea breath test (C14-UBT) in two different peptic ulcer populations and in community controls. Second, the aim was to explore the association between the level of H pylori IgG antibodies and severity of inflammation as to active peptic ulceration in the same populations.
METHODS: Vagotomized (n = 83), medically treated peptic ulcer patients (n = 73) and one reference group of community controls (n = 88) were gastroscoped. H pylori status was determined by histology, bacterial growth, C14-UBT and serology. Based on the updated Sydney System, cumulative scores from biopsies from the prepyloruos, incisura angularis, corpus and fundus were calculated.
RESULTS: The prevalence of H pylori infection varied from 70% to 79%. The C14-UBT had high accuracy compared to the serology test. The sensitivity of the serology test was good, but the specificity was low (41%-71%). The association between H pylori IgG antibodies and scores of gastric mucosal inflammation and current or previous peptic ulcer were weak.
CONCLUSION: The accuracy of C14-UBT to diagnose H pylori infection was good, and the clinical utility of a negative H pylori serology test was substantial, while the gain in clinical information of a positive test was meagre. Positive H pylori titres could not distinguish between subjects with or those without active peptic ulceration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18763287      PMCID: PMC2742932          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.5039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  28 in total

1.  Pearls and pitfalls of assessing Helicobacter pylori status.

Authors:  Z Z Nurgalieva; D Y Graham
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.088

2.  Diagnosis of gastritis by means of a combination of serological analyses.

Authors:  Erik Mårdh; Sven Mårdh; Bibbi Mårdh; Kurt Borch
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Can helicobacter pylori serology still be applied as a surrogate marker to identify peptic ulcer disease in dyspepsia?

Authors:  H H Xia; J S Kalantar; H M Mitchell; N J Talley
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Testing for Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients suspected of peptic ulcer disease in primary care: cross sectional study.

Authors:  C F Weijnen; M E Numans; N J de Wit; A J Smout; K G Moons; T J Verheij; A W Hoes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-14

Review 5.  The updated Sydney system: classification and grading of gastritis as the basis of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M Stolte; A Meining
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  The usefulness of the likelihood ratio in the diagnosis of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  P Moayyedi; A T Axon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Tests for Helicobacter pylori infection: a critical appraisal from primary care.

Authors:  A P Roberts; S M Childs; G Rubin; N J de Wit
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Spectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick test for urinary tract infection.

Authors:  M S Lachs; I Nachamkin; P H Edelstein; J Goldman; A R Feinstein; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Review article: diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter: a 2002 updated review.

Authors:  C Basset; J Holton; C Ricci; L Gatta; A Tampieri; F Perna; M Miglioli; D Vaira
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Tips for teachers of evidence-based medicine: making sense of diagnostic test results using likelihood ratios.

Authors:  W Scott Richardson; Mark C Wilson; Sheri A Keitz; Peter C Wyer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reliability of Diagnostic Tests for Helicobacter pylori Infection.

Authors:  S Redéen; F Petersson; E Törnkrantz; H Levander; E Mårdh; K Borch
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.260

2.  Efficacy of serology driven "test and treat strategy" for eradication of H. pylori in patients with rheumatic disease in the Netherlands.

Authors:  H T J I de Leest; K S S Steen; W F Lems; M A F J van de Laar; A M Huisman; S W Kadir; H H M L Houben; P J Kostense; E J Kuipers; B A C Dijkmans; Y J Debets-Ossenkopp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Correlation of serology with morphological changes in gastric biopsy in Helicobacter pylori infection and evaluation of immunohistochemistry for H. pylori identification.

Authors:  Shailaja Shukla; Mukta Pujani; Aditya Agarwal; Meenu Pujani; Anurag Rohtagi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

4.  Assessment of Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients on NSAID treatment.

Authors:  Harald E Vonkeman; Htji Deleest; Mafj van Delaar; J Vanbaarlen; Kss Steen; Wf Lems; Jwj Bijlsma; Ej Kuipers; Hhml Houben; M Janssen; Bac Dijkmans
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Lawrence Mj Best; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sulman Siddique; Abiram Selladurai; Akash Gandhi; Benjamin Low; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.