Literature DB >> 1876287

Comparison of survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hospital haemodialysis: a multicentric study.

M A Gentil1, A Carriazo, M I Pavón, M Rosado, D Castillo, B Ramos, G R Algarra, F Tejuca, V P Bañasco, J A Milan.   

Abstract

We compared the survival of 842 patients on centre haemodialysis to 272 patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). All patients selected had begun treatment between 1 January 1984 and 30 June 1988 and were from six centres which participate in a regional renal patients registry. Patients on CAPD were older and had a greater proportion of diabetes and other associated diseases. Age, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases were associated with a shorter survival on treatment in all the patients studied. Without adjustment for risk factors, patient 3-year survival was higher in centre haemodialysis than in CAPD, 80% versus 64% respectively. However, no significant differences could be shown in the survival rates of the two treatment modalities after accounting for the heterogeneity of the patients in the two groups, either by stratification or by multivariate analysis (Cox). Age was the main predictive factor for CAPD patient survival, while the influence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases was less clear. Technique survival was much better in centre haemodialysis (94% versus 56% in CAPD, 3-year survival). Older age and diabetes mellitus were associated with a greater risk of switching from centre haemodialysis to CAPD and a trend to retain those patients on CAPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1876287     DOI: 10.1093/ndt/6.6.444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  6 in total

1.  Paying for Frequent Dialysis.

Authors:  Adam S Wilk; Richard A Hirth; Joseph M Messana
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Cardiac disease in diabetic end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  R N Foley; B F Culleton; P S Parfrey; J D Harnett; G M Kent; D C Murray; P E Barre
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Diabetes, glycaemic control and mortality risk in patients on haemodialysis: the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Pattern Study.

Authors:  Y Hayashino; S Fukuhara; T Akiba; T Akizawa; Y Asano; A Saito; J L Bragg-Gresham; S P B Ramirez; F K Port; K Kurokawa
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Peritoneal dialysis in Hungary.

Authors:  A Karátson; J Makó
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Comparison of cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Cheng Han Ng; Zhi Hao Ong; Hersharan Kaur Sran; Teo Boon Wee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Survival analysis of Korean end-stage renal disease patients according to renal replacement therapy in a single center.

Authors:  Young-Soo Song; Heesun Jung; Jinyoung Shim; Changkwon Oh; Gyu-Tae Shin; Heungsoo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.