Literature DB >> 18761730

Assessment of the effectiveness of radon screening programs in reducing lung cancer mortality.

Fabien Gagnon1, Mathieu Courchesne, Benoît Lévesque, Pierre Ayotte, Jean-Marc Leclerc, Jean-Claude Belles-Isles, Claude Prévost, Jean-Claude Dessau.   

Abstract

The present study was aimed at assessing the health consequences of the presence of radon in Quebec homes and the possible impact of various screening programs on lung cancer mortality. Lung cancer risk due to this radioactive gas was estimated according to the cancer risk model developed by the Sixth Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations. Objective data on residential radon exposure, population mobility, and tobacco use in the study population were integrated into a Monte-Carlo-type model. Participation rates to radon screening programs were estimated from published data. According to the model used, approximately 10% of deaths due to lung cancer are attributable to residential radon exposure on a yearly basis in Quebec. In the long term, the promotion of a universal screening program would prevent less than one death/year on a province-wide scale (0.8 case; IC 99%: -3.6 to 5.2 cases/year), for an overall reduction of 0.19% in radon-related mortality. Reductions in mortality due to radon by (1) the implementation of a targeted screening program in the region with the highest concentrations, (2) the promotion of screening on a local basis with financial support, or (3) the realization of systematic investigations in primary and secondary schools would increase to 1%, 14%, and 16.4%, respectively, in the each of the populations targeted by these scenarios. Other than the battle against tobacco use, radon screening in public buildings thus currently appears as the most promising screening policy for reducing radon-related lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18761730     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  6 in total

1.  An epidemiological paradox.

Authors:  Fabien Gagnon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Implementation of a radon measurement protocol and its communication plan by child care centre managers in Québec.

Authors:  Fabien Gagnon; Patrick Poulin; Jean-Marc Leclerc; Jean-Claude Dessau; Aryan Abab; Pamela Arsenault; Fady El-Turaby; Guillaume Lachance-Paquette; Félix-Antoine Vézina
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2016-10-20

3.  Radon, smoking, and lung cancer: the need to refocus radon control policy.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; David Mendez; Martin A Philbert
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Epidemiology of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Malcolm V Brock; Jean G Ford; Jonathan M Samet; Simon D Spivack
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  An Exploratory Analysis of Public Awareness and Perception of Ionizing Radiation and Guide to Public Health Practice in Vermont.

Authors:  Katherine M Evans; Jenna Bodmer; Bryce Edwards; James Levins; Amanda O'Meara; Merima Ruhotina; Richard Smith; Thomas Delaney; Razelle Hoffman-Contois; Linda Boccuzzo; Heidi Hales; Jan K Carney
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  Lung cancer risk from radon in Ontario, Canada: how many lung cancers can we prevent?

Authors:  Emily Peterson; Amira Aker; JinHee Kim; Ye Li; Kevin Brand; Ray Copes
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.506

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.