K Kow1, D H Thamm, J Terry, K Grunerud, S M Bailey, S J Withrow, S E Lana. 1. Department of Clinical Science, Animal Cancer Center, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. kelvin.kow@oregonstate.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that canine osteosarcoma (OSA) cell lines and samples from clinical patients are predominantly telomerase positive. In contrast, the majority of OSA samples from human patients appear to be telomerase negative, maintaining telomere length by an alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanism. The purpose of the current study was to examine the telomerase status of a large number of OSA samples from dogs and determine if telomerase status can serve as a prognostic factor. HYPOTHESIS: The majority of clinical canine OSA appendicular lesions will be telomerase positive, and telomerase positivity will negatively impact disease outcome. ANIMALS: Sixty-seven dogs with appendicular OSA presenting to the Colorado State University Animal Cancer Center for treatment. METHODS: The Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol was performed on tissue samples from primary canine appendicular OSA to determine the presence of telomerase activity. Telomere restriction fragment (TRF) analysis was utilized to determine telomere length and detect ALT. Outcome data were obtained in a retrospective manner and correlated with telomerase status. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of canine OSA samples were telomerase positive. Telomerase status did not have an impact on disease-free interval or survival time. Nine of 10 telomerase-negative samples examined were consistent with an ALT phenotype, based on TRF analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of canine OSA are telomerase positive, suggesting that telomerase may be a valuable target for canine OSA therapy. Additionally, telomerase status does not appear to be a prognostic factor in canine OSA.
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that canineosteosarcoma (OSA) cell lines and samples from clinical patients are predominantly telomerase positive. In contrast, the majority of OSA samples from humanpatients appear to be telomerase negative, maintaining telomere length by an alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanism. The purpose of the current study was to examine the telomerase status of a large number of OSA samples from dogs and determine if telomerase status can serve as a prognostic factor. HYPOTHESIS: The majority of clinical canine OSA appendicular lesions will be telomerase positive, and telomerase positivity will negatively impact disease outcome. ANIMALS: Sixty-seven dogs with appendicular OSA presenting to the Colorado State University Animal Cancer Center for treatment. METHODS: The Telomeric Repeat Amplification Protocol was performed on tissue samples from primary canineappendicular OSA to determine the presence of telomerase activity. Telomere restriction fragment (TRF) analysis was utilized to determine telomere length and detect ALT. Outcome data were obtained in a retrospective manner and correlated with telomerase status. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of canine OSA samples were telomerase positive. Telomerase status did not have an impact on disease-free interval or survival time. Nine of 10 telomerase-negative samples examined were consistent with an ALT phenotype, based on TRF analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of canine OSA are telomerase positive, suggesting that telomerase may be a valuable target for canine OSA therapy. Additionally, telomerase status does not appear to be a prognostic factor in canine OSA.
Authors: L C de Sá Rodrigues; K E Holmes; V Thompson; C M Piskun; S E Lana; M A Newton; T J Stein Journal: Vet Comp Oncol Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 2.613
Authors: Shirley Chu; Zachary L Skidmore; Jason Kunisaki; Jason R Walker; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith; Jeffrey N Bryan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Junko Maeda; Charles R Yurkon; Hiroshi Fujisawa; Masami Kaneko; Stefan C Genet; Erica J Roybal; Garrett W Rota; Ethan R Saffer; Barbara J Rose; William H Hanneman; Douglas H Thamm; Takamitsu A Kato Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 3.240