Literature DB >> 18761130

Does sex influence the age of acquisition of common names? A contrast of different semantic categories.

Riccardo Barbarotto1, Marcella Laiacona, Erminio Capitani.   

Abstract

The literature reports a sex-related asymmetry in the ability to process different semantic categories: women are more proficient with biological categories and men with man-made objects. The origin of this asymmetry is still debated. In this study, we directly checked whether the acquisition of names belonging to different semantic categories differs according to sex. We carried out our inquiry on 202 children aged 3-5 years, who were given a coloured picture naming task using a battery of 60 stimuli belonging to different semantic categories. Boys differed from girls only on naming of stimuli belonging to the categories of tools and vehicles, where they showed an earlier name acquisition. No sex differences were found for animals or plant life, notwithstanding evidence in the literature of an overrepresentation of males among patients affected by biological categories impairment. Our findings suggest that the male advantage for tools and vehicles reported in the literature on verbal fluency and naming tasks is strongly related to the earlier age in males of name acquisition for these categories, and possibly to their higher familiarity. On the contrary, the female advantage for plant life knowledge, which becomes evident later in life, has a still undefined nature and only a dubious relationship to familiarity, although it is sufficient to cause an overrepresentation of males among patients affected by a category specific impairment of biological categories, especially of plant life knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18761130     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  4 in total

Review 1.  A lifespan perspective on semantic processing of concrete concepts: does a sensory/motor model have the potential to bridge the gap?

Authors:  Sharon M Antonucci; Mary Alt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neuroanatomical and cognitive mediators of age-related differences in perceptual priming and learning.

Authors:  Kristen M Kennedy; Karen M Rodrigue; Denise Head; Faith Gunning-Dixon; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Revised and extended norms for a picture naming test sensitive to category dissociations.

Authors:  Marcella Laiacona; Riccardo Barbarotto; Elena Baratelli; Erminio Capitani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Inborn and experience-dependent models of categorical brain organization. A position paper.

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.