Literature DB >> 18760851

Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumours: a planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc and fixed gantry techniques.

Antonella Fogliata1, Alessandro Clivio, Giorgia Nicolini, Eugenio Vanetti, Luca Cozzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The potential benefits and limitations of the new RapidArc treatment concept compared to Helical Tomotherapy and fixed gantry intensity modulation techniques have been assessed at treatment planning level on 12 patients presenting with 'benign' brain tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plans for five acoustic neurinomas, five meningiomas and two pituitary adenomas were computed for an Helical Tomotherapy (HT) unit, for RapidArc delivery (RA) on a linac equipped with two types of MLC (RA_HD120 with the new High Definition MLC with 2.5mm leaf width at isocentre and RA_M120 with the standard Millennium with 5mm resolution) and for fixed beam IMRT with the High Definition MLC. Analysis was mostly performed on physical quantities derived from Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs).
RESULTS: Target coverage resulted basically equivalent among techniques. V(95%) (in %) was higher than 99% for all techniques, minimum significant dose (D(99%)) was 95.5+/-1.4 for IMRT, 96.2+/-1.4 and 97.0+/-1.2 for the RA_HD120 and RA_M120 approaches and 96.8+/-1.7 for HT, maximum significant dose (D(1%), in %) was 102.2+/-0.8, 102.7+/-0.5, 102.4+/-0.5 and 103.0+/-1.1, respectively, standard deviation (in %) was 1.4+/-0.4, 1.3+/-0.3, 1.1+/-0.2 and 0.8+/-0.3, respectively. Conformity Index (CI(95%)) was 0.47+/-0.12, 0.46+/-0.12, 0.43+/-0.11 and 0.38+/-0.11, respectively. For organs at risk all techniques respected planning objectives. Concerning the healthy tissue: V(10 Gy) (in %) was 9.4+/-5.5, 9.9+/-6.1, 9.2+/-6.1 and 12.1+/-8.8, respectively. Integral dose measured on the healthy tissue was 7.5+/-3.3, 9.7+/-3.4, 8.7+/-3.4, 10.4+/-4.2 10(3) Gy cm(3), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: For the class of tumours investigated in this report, HT and RA and IMRT proved to be adequate to properly treat patients. Further studies on more complex cases need to be investigated in order to assess the effectiveness of this new technique in a broader clinical perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760851     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  62 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Hui-Min Ting; Su-Hua Lo; Yu-Wen Wang; Chiu-Ching Tuan; Fu-Min Fang; Te-Jen Su
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 2.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice.

Authors:  M Teoh; C H Clark; K Wood; S Whitaker; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Dosimetric comparison of 2.5 mm vs. 3.0 mm leaf width micro-multileaf collimator-based treatment systems for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery using dynamic conformal arcs: implications for treatment planning.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Shinya Hayashi; Hidekazu Tanaka; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Outcome and toxicity profiles in the treatment of locally advanced lung cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Marta Scorsetti; Piera Navarria; Fiorenza De Rose; AnnaMaria Ascolese; Elena Clerici; Ciro Franzese; Francesca Lobefalo; Giacomo Reggiori; Pietro Mancosu; Stefano Tomatis; Antonella Fogliata; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients ineligible for surgery or ablative treatments.

Authors:  P-M Wang; W-C Hsu; N-N Chung; F-L Chang; A Fogliata; L Cozzi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation of rectal cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy: summary of technical and dosimetric features and early clinical experience.

Authors:  Antonella Richetti; Antonella Fogliata; Alessandro Clivio; Giorgia Nicolini; Gianfranco Pesce; Emanuela Salati; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Application of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in a dual-vendor environment.

Authors:  Barbara Dobler; Karin Weidner; Oliver Koelbl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Whole abdomen radiation therapy in ovarian cancers: a comparison between fixed beam and volumetric arc based intensity modulation.

Authors:  Umesh Mahantshetty; Swamidas Jamema; Reena Engineer; Deepak Deshpande; Rajiv Sarin; Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Shyamkishore Shrivastava; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  On the performances of Intensity Modulated Protons, RapidArc and Helical Tomotherapy for selected paediatric cases.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Slav Yartsev; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Rolf Wyttenbach; Glenn Bauman; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy for bilateral breast: a treatment planning and dosimetric comparison for volumetric modulated arc and fixed field intensity modulated therapy.

Authors:  Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Eugenio Vanetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.