Literature DB >> 18760779

Effectiveness and safety of loop electrosurgical excision procedure in a low-resource setting.

Prabhakaran Rema1, Sambasivan Suchetha, Somanathan Thara, Jean Marie Fayette, Ramani Wesley, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in a low-resource setting.
METHODS: Women participating in a cervical screening study in India with histologically confirmed CIN unsuitable for cryotherapy were advised to undergo LEEP. One year after treatment the cervix was visually inspected with acetic acid, followed by colposcopy and biopsy taken from abnormal areas. Cure was defined as no clinical or histologic evidence of CIN. Factors influencing cure rates were evaluated by chi(2) tests.
RESULTS: Of the 311 women who underwent LEEP, 283 reported for 1-year follow-up and 248 (87.6%) were disease free. Cure rates were 93.0% for CIN 1, 85.5% for CIN 2, and 72.7% for CIN 3. Minor adverse effects were observed in 34 women and complications were seen in 5 women.
CONCLUSION: LEEP was associated with minimal complications and acceptable cure rates in a low-resource setting, although women with larger lesions had lower cure rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760779     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  5 in total

1.  See-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention for HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Carla J Chibwesha; Susan Cu-Uvin
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  The ongoing history of thermal therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Evan S Glazer; Steven A Curley
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 3.  Are treatments for cervical precancerous lesions in less-developed countries safe enough to promote scaling-up of cervical screening programs? A systematic review.

Authors:  Eric Chamot; Sibylle Kristensen; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  'See-and-treat' works for cervical cancer prevention: what about controlling the high burden in India?

Authors:  R Sankaranarayanan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Barriers and Challenges to Treatment Alternatives for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer in Lower-Resource Settings.

Authors:  Emily S Wu; Jose Jeronimo; Sarah Feldman
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2017-05-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.