Literature DB >> 18760691

Activity in both hippocampus and perirhinal cortex predicts the memory strength of subsequently remembered information.

Yael Shrager1, C Brock Kirwan, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that hippocampal activity predicts subsequent recognition success when recognition decisions are based disproportionately on recollection, whereas perirhinal activity predicts recognition success when decisions are based primarily on familiarity. Another perspective is that both hippocampal and perirhinal activity are predictive of overall memory strength. We tested the relationship between brain activity during learning and subsequent memory strength. Activity in a number of cortical regions (including regions within the "default network") was negatively correlated with subsequent memory strength, suggesting that this activity reflects inattention or mind wandering (and, consequently, poor memory). In contrast, activity in both hippocampus and perirhinal cortex positively correlated with the subsequent memory strength of remembered items. This finding suggests that both structures cooperate during learning to determine the memory strength of what is being learned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760691      PMCID: PMC2614916          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  41 in total

1.  Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI.

Authors:  L J Otten; M D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding.

Authors:  Jeremy R Reynolds; David I Donaldson; Anthony D Wagner; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

4.  Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gold; Christine N Smith; Peter J Bayley; Yael Shrager; James B Brewer; Craig E L Stark; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought.

Authors:  Malia F Mason; Michael I Norton; John D Van Horn; Daniel M Wegner; Scott T Grafton; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; John T Wixted; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state. A functional MRI study.

Authors:  J R Binder; J A Frost; T A Hammeke; P S Bellgowan; S M Rao; R W Cox
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain.

Authors:  D A Gusnard; M E Raichle; M E Raichle
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  The medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; Craig E L Stark; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  44 in total

1.  Remembering first impressions: effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory.

Authors:  Roee Gilron; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Separable prefrontal cortex contributions to free recall.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Ilke Oztekin; David Badre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Effects of age on negative subsequent memory effects associated with the encoding of item and item-context information.

Authors:  Julia T Mattson; Tracy H Wang; Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Medial temporal lobe activity can distinguish between old and new stimuli independently of overt behavioral choice.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Yael Shrager; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Recognition memory: adding a response deadline eliminates recollection but spares familiarity.

Authors:  Magdalena M Sauvage; Zachery Beer; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Different nonlinear functions in hippocampus and perirhinal cortex relating functional MRI activity to memory strength.

Authors:  Zhuang Song; John T Wixted; Christine N Smith; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Neural correlates of confidence during item recognition and source memory retrieval: evidence for both dual-process and strength memory theories.

Authors:  Scott M Hayes; Norbou Buchler; Jared Stokes; James Kragel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Subsequent memory effect in intracranial and scalp EEG.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; John F Burke; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The encoding/retrieval flip: interactions between memory performance and memory stage and relationship to intrinsic cortical networks.

Authors:  Willem Huijbers; Aaron P Schultz; Patrizia Vannini; Donald G McLaren; Sarah E Wigman; Andrew M Ward; Trey Hedden; Reisa A Sperling
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Posterior midline and ventral parietal activity is associated with retrieval success and encoding failure.

Authors:  Sander M Daselaar; Steven E Prince; Nancy A Dennis; Scott M Hayes; Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.