Literature DB >> 18760649

The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. A summary of the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial.

P M Poortmans1, L Collette, H Bartelink, H Struikmans, W F Van den Bogaert, A Fourquet, J J Jager, W Hoogenraad, R-P Müller, J-B Dubois, M Bolla, M Van Der Hulst, C C Wárlám-Rodenhuis, M Pierart, J-C Horiot.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the boost dose to the primary tumour bed in the framework of breast conserving therapy on local control, cosmetic results, fibrosis and overall survival for patients with early stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five thousand five hundred and sixty-nine patients after lumpectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomised. After a microscopically complete lumpectomy (5318 patients), the boost doses were either 0 or 16 Gy, while after a microscopically incomplete (251 patients) lumpectomy randomisation was between 10 and 26 Gy. The results at a median follow-up of 10 years are presented.
RESULTS: At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the 0 Gy and the 16 Gy boost groups (p < 0.0001) and 17.5% versus 10.8% for the 10 and 26 Gy boost groups, respectively (p > 0.1). There was no statistically significant interaction per age group but recurrences tended to occur earlier in younger patients. As younger patients had a higher cumulative risk of local relapse by year 10, the magnitude of the absolute 10-year risk reduction achieved with the boost decreased with increasing age. Development of fibrosis was significantly dependent on the boost dose with a 10-year rate for severe fibrosis of 1.6% after 0 Gy, 3.3% after 10 Gy, 4.4% after 16 Gy and 14.4% after 26 Gy, respectively.
CONCLUSION: An increase of the dose with 16 Gy improved local control for patients after a complete lumpectomy only. The development of fibrosis was clearly dose dependent. With 10 years median follow-up, no impact of survival was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760649     DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2008.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Radiother        ISSN: 1278-3218            Impact factor:   1.018


  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) by use of replanning the tumor bed boost with repeated computed tomography (CT) simulation after whole breast irradiation (WBI) for breast cancer patients having clinically evident seroma.

Authors:  Omer Sager; Ferrat Dincoglan; Bora Uysal; Selcuk Demiral; Hakan Gamsiz; Yelda Elcim; Esin Gundem; Bahar Dirican; Murat Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Unique aspects of caring for young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Raina M Ferzoco; Kathryn J Ruddy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Beam angle manipulation to reduce cardiac dose during breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Vivekanandan; J Mhlanga; D Launders; A Przeslak; D A L Morgan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for breast cancer: a dose escalation study.

Authors:  Edy Ippolito; Carla Germana Rinaldi; Sonia Silipigni; Carlo Greco; Michele Fiore; Antonella Sicilia; Lucio Trodella; Rolando Maria D'Angelillo; Sara Ramella
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  The use of radiotherapy for early breast cancer in woman at different ages.

Authors:  F A Calvo; C V Sole; S Rivera; R Meiriño; S Lizarraga; M A Infante; E Boldo; C Ferrer; H Marsiglia; E Deutsch
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Comparison of two radiation techniques for the breast boost in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria C De Santis; Luigia Nardone; Barbara Diletto; Roberta Canna; Michela Dispinzieri; Lorenza Marino; Laura Lozza; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Risk factors for seroma evacuation in breast cancer patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michał Falco; Bartłomiej Masojć; Magdalena Rolla; Agnieszka Czekała; Jolanta Pietruszewska; Agnieszka Rubik-Leszczyńska; Mirosław Lewocki; Magdalena Łukowiak; Andrzej Kram
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-29

9.  ROS-scavenger and radioprotective efficacy of the new PrC-210 aminothiol.

Authors:  Daniel D Peebles; Cheryl M Soref; Richard R Copp; Allen L Thunberg; William E Fahl
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  RTOG 95-17, a Phase II trial to evaluate brachytherapy as the sole method of radiation therapy for Stage I and II breast carcinoma--year-5 toxicity and cosmesis.

Authors:  Rachel Rabinovitch; Kathryn Winter; Robert Kuske; John Bolton; Doug Arthur; Troy Scroggins; Frank Vicini; Beryl McCormick; Julia White
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.