Literature DB >> 18760413

Mechanical strength of bone allografts subjected to chemical sterilization and other terminal processing methods.

Mark M Mikhael1, Paul M Huddleston, Mark E Zobitz, Quingshan Chen, Kristin D Zhao, Kai-Nan An.   

Abstract

Infectious disease transmission through the use of human donor allografts can be a catastrophic complication in an otherwise straightforward surgical procedure. The use of bone allograft in reconstructive orthopedic surgeries is increasing, yet severe complications, including death, can result if the transplanted tissues transmit a communicable disease to the tissue recipient. The BioCleanse tissue sterilization process is a fully automated, low-temperature chemical sterilization process that renders allograft tissue sterile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a chemical tissue sterilization process on the mechanical strength of cortical bone allografts prior to implantation. Cylindrical cortical bone specimens were harvested from seven human cadaver donors and treated either by: chemical sterilization alone; chemical sterilization and terminal sterilization by gamma irradiation; chemical sterilization, lyophilization, terminal sterilization by STERRAD and rehydration; or untreated. The specimens were tested to failure in axial compression, diametral compression, shear, or bending. There were no significant differences in ultimate stress, strain, or fracture energy between the chemically sterilized and control groups in any of the testing modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760413     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants.

Authors:  Robert F Heary; Naresh Parvathreddy; Sujitha Sampath; Nitin Agarwal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Novel approaches to bone grafting: porosity, bone morphogenetic proteins, stem cells, and the periosteum.

Authors:  Peter Petrochenko; Roger J Narayan
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2010

3.  Allograft tissue irradiation and failure rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jesse Dashe; Robert L Parisien; Antonio Cusano; Emily J Curry; Asheesh Bedi; Xinning Li
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-18

4.  Comparative biomechanical and microstructural analysis of native versus peracetic acid-ethanol treated cancellous bone graft.

Authors:  Juliane Rauh; Florian Despang; Jorgen Baas; Cornelia Liebers; Axel Pruss; Michael Gelinsky; Klaus-Peter Günther; Maik Stiehler
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Disinfection of human musculoskeletal allografts in tissue banking: a systematic review.

Authors:  J Mohr; M Germain; M Winters; S Fraser; A Duong; A Garibaldi; N Simunovic; D Alsop; D Dao; R Bessemer; O R Ayeni
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  A Decellularized Porcine Xenograft-Derived Bone Scaffold for Clinical Use as a Bone Graft Substitute: A Critical Evaluation of Processing and Structure.

Authors:  Daniel N Bracey; Thorsten M Seyler; Alexander H Jinnah; Mark O Lively; Jeffrey S Willey; Thomas L Smith; Mark E Van Dyke; Patrick W Whitlock
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-07-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.