Literature DB >> 18760263

Distinct neural substrates for deductive and mathematical processing.

James K Kroger1, Leigh E Nystrom, Jonathan D Cohen, Philip N Johnson-Laird.   

Abstract

In an effort to clarify how deductive reasoning is accomplished, an fMRI study was performed to observe the neural substrates of logical reasoning and mathematical calculation. Participants viewed a problem statement and three premises, and then either a conclusion or a mathematical formula. They had to indicate whether the conclusion followed from the premises, or to solve the mathematical formula. Language areas of the brain (Broca's and Wernicke's area) responded as the premises and the conclusion were read, but solution of the problems was then carried out by non-language areas. Regions in right prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal lobe were more active for reasoning than for calculation, whereas regions in left prefrontal cortex and superior parietal lobe were more active for calculation than for reasoning. In reasoning, only those problems calling for a search for counterexamples to conclusions recruited right frontal pole. These results have important implications for understanding how higher cognition, including deduction, is implemented in the brain. Different sorts of thinking recruit separate neural substrates, and logical reasoning goes beyond linguistic regions of the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18760263     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  20 in total

Review 1.  Mental models and human reasoning.

Authors:  Philip N Johnson-Laird
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Functional clustering of the human inferior parietal lobule by whole-brain connectivity mapping of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging signals.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-01-30

3.  Contradiction in universal and particular reasoning.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Medaglia; Franca Tecchio; Stefano Seri; Giorgio Di Lorenzo; Paolo M Rossini; Camillo Porcaro
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The evolution of clinical functional imaging during the past 2 decades and its current impact on neurosurgical planning.

Authors:  J J Pillai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The brain network for deductive reasoning: a quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Jérôme Prado; Angad Chadha; James R Booth
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Meta-analytic evidence for a core problem solving network across multiple representational domains.

Authors:  Jessica E Bartley; Emily R Boeving; Michael C Riedel; Katherine L Bottenhorn; Taylor Salo; Simon B Eickhoff; Eric Brewe; Matthew T Sutherland; Angela R Laird
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  At the core of reasoning: Dissociating deductive and non-deductive load.

Authors:  John P Coetzee; Martin M Monti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Cerebrovascular reactivity mapping for brain tumor presurgical planning.

Authors:  Domenico Zaca; Jun Hua; Jay J Pillai
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-10

Review 9.  An evolutionarily adaptive neural architecture for social reasoning.

Authors:  Aron K Barbey; Frank Krueger; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Architecture of explanatory inference in the human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Aron K Barbey; Richard Patterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.