Literature DB >> 18759508

Monitoring the safety of pioglitazone : results of a prescription-event monitoring study of 12,772 patients in England.

Rachna Kasliwal1, Lynda V Wilton, Saad A W Shakir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pioglitazone is an antidiabetic drug that targets insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by stimulating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma. Pioglitazone belongs to a class of drugs called thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and was launched in the UK in November 2000.
OBJECTIVE: To monitor, using prescription-event monitoring, the post-marketing safety of pioglitazone, which is prescribed in primary care in England.
METHODS: An observational cohort study in which patients were identified from dispensed prescriptions issued by primary-care physicians/general practitioners (GPs) between November 2000 and June 2001. Information on demographics, the use of pioglitazone, clinical event data, events suspected as adverse drug reactions, reasons for stopping the drug and cause of death (if appropriate) were collected using questionnaires posted to GPs at least 8 months after the date of first prescription for each patient. Event incidence densities (IDs) [number of first reports of an event/1000 patient-months of exposure] were calculated.
RESULTS: The cohort comprised 12 772 patients (median age 62 years); 53.1% were males. The most frequent starting daily dose of pioglitazone was either 15 mg or 30 mg (n = 10 298). Pioglitazone/metformin was the most frequently used combination reported (n = 4029). Of the 3690 patients who stopped treatment, 1143 stopped due to reasons related to poor glycaemic control. 'Oedema/fluid retention' (n = 121) and 'weight gain' (n = 118) also appeared high on the list of reasons for discontinuing. 'Malaise/lassitude' and 'nausea/vomiting' were the most frequently reported suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with pioglitazone. Specific clinical events considered as early onset events with pioglitazone were: 'malaise/lassitude', 'nausea/vomiting', 'dizziness', 'headache/migraine', 'diarrhoea', 'weight gain' and 'abnormal liver function test'.
CONCLUSION: Pioglitazone was considered to be a reasonably well tolerated drug, with the main reasons for discontinuing being related to the drug not being effective. The frequency of individual ADRs reported in this study did not exceed the frequency in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for pioglitazone. However, amongst the frequently reported suspected ADRs, 'nausea/vomiting' and 'diarrhoea' are not listed in the SPC. Further research is required to assess whether the risk of myocardial infarction and deaths due to cardiovascular causes is a class effect of the thiazolidinediones. Results from this study should be taken into account with other clinical and pharmacoepidemiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18759508     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200831100-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  22 in total

1.  Pioglitazone-associated fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  Michael P Chase; Joseph C Yarze
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Severe but reversible cholestatic liver injury after pioglitazone therapy.

Authors:  Amar G Pinto; Oscar W Cummings; Naga Chalasani
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Thiazolidinedione-associated congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema.

Authors:  Andrew Jamieson; Youssif Abousleiman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Diabetes drug withdrawn after reports of hepatic events.

Authors:  J Wise
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-12-13

5.  Mixed hepatocellular-cholestatic liver injury after pioglitazone therapy.

Authors:  Louis D May; Jay H Lefkowitch; Michael T Kram; David E Rubin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Diabetic embryopathy: pathogenesis, prenatal diagnosis and prevention.

Authors:  E A Reece; J C Hobbins
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Global burden of diabetes, 1995-2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections.

Authors:  H King; R E Aubert; W H Herman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Effect of the insulin sensitizer pioglitazone on insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, and ovulatory dysfunction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Nora Brettenthaler; Christian De Geyter; Peter R Huber; Ulrich Keller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  The effect of pioglitazone on recurrent myocardial infarction in 2,445 patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction: results from the PROactive (PROactive 05) Study.

Authors:  Erland Erdmann; John A Dormandy; Bernard Charbonnel; Massimo Massi-Benedetti; Ian K Moules; Allan M Skene
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Improvement of fat redistribution, insulin resistance and hepatic fatty infiltration in HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome by pioglitazone: a case report.

Authors:  Wisit Prasithsirikul; Pongamorn Bunnag
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2004-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Liver safety in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with pioglitazone: results from a 3-year, randomized, comparator-controlled study in the US.

Authors:  Keith G Tolman; James W Freston; Stuart Kupfer; Alfonso Perez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Risk management and outcomes of adverse events to pioglitazone in primary care in the UK: an observational study.

Authors:  Carole Fogg; Rachna Kasliwal; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Hypoglycaemia with oral antidiabetic drugs: results from prescription-event monitoring cohorts of rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, nateglinide and repaglinide.

Authors:  Veronika Vlckova; Victoria Cornelius; Rachna Kasliwal; Lynda Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: safety and efficacy review.

Authors:  Cyrus V Desouza; Vijay Shivaswamy
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 5.  A review of methods used in assessing non-serious adverse drug events in observational studies among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  Liana Hakobyan; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Daniela Dobre; Petra Denig
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Do we still need pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes? A risk-benefit critique in 2013.

Authors:  Guntram Schernthaner; Craig J Currie; Gerit-Holger Schernthaner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  A study on the short-term effect of cafeteria diet and pioglitazone on insulin resistance and serum levels of adiponectin and ghrelin.

Authors:  G Colombo; M L Bazzo; C L Nogueira; M D H P Colombo; L L Schiavon; A J d'Acampora
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.590

Review 8.  The treatment of type 2 diabetes in the presence of renal impairment: what we should know about newer therapies.

Authors:  Melanie Davies; Sudesna Chatterjee; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.