PURPOSE: To interrogate grade II, III, and IV gliomas and characterize the critical effectors within the PI3-kinase pathway upstream and downstream of mTOR. Experimental design Tissues from 87 patients who were treated at UCSF between 1990 and 2004 were analyzed. Twenty-eight grade II, 17 grade III glioma, 26 grade IV gliomas, and 16 non-tumor brain specimens were analyzed. Protein levels were assessed by immunoblots; RNA levels were determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification. To address the multiple comparisons, first an overall analysis was done comparing the four groups using Spearman's Correlation Coefficient. Only if this analysis was statistically significant were individual pairwise comparisons done. RESULTS: Multiple comparison analyses revealed a significant correlation with grade for all variables examined, except phosphorylated-S6. Expression of phosphorylated-4E-BP1, phosphorylated-PKB/Akt, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2 correlated with grade (P < 0.01 for all). We extended our analyses to ask whether decreases in TSC proteins levels were due to changes in mRNA levels, or due to changes in post-transcriptional alterations. We found significantly lower levels of TSC1 and TSC2 mRNA in GBMs than in grade II gliomas or non-tumor brain (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Expression levels of critical signaling molecules upstream and downstream of mTOR differ between non-tumor brain and gliomas of any grade. The single variable whose expression did not differ between non-tumor brain and gliomas was phosphorylated-S6, suggesting that other protein kinases, in addition to mTOR, contribute significantly to S6 phosphorylation. mTOR provides a rational therapeutic target in gliomas of all grades, and clinical benefit may emerge as mTOR inhibitors are combined with additional agents.
PURPOSE: To interrogate grade II, III, and IV gliomas and characterize the critical effectors within the PI3-kinase pathway upstream and downstream of mTOR. Experimental design Tissues from 87 patients who were treated at UCSF between 1990 and 2004 were analyzed. Twenty-eight grade II, 17 grade III glioma, 26 grade IV gliomas, and 16 non-tumor brain specimens were analyzed. Protein levels were assessed by immunoblots; RNA levels were determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification. To address the multiple comparisons, first an overall analysis was done comparing the four groups using Spearman's Correlation Coefficient. Only if this analysis was statistically significant were individual pairwise comparisons done. RESULTS: Multiple comparison analyses revealed a significant correlation with grade for all variables examined, except phosphorylated-S6. Expression of phosphorylated-4E-BP1, phosphorylated-PKB/Akt, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2 correlated with grade (P < 0.01 for all). We extended our analyses to ask whether decreases in TSC proteins levels were due to changes in mRNA levels, or due to changes in post-transcriptional alterations. We found significantly lower levels of TSC1 and TSC2 mRNA in GBMs than in grade II gliomas or non-tumor brain (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Expression levels of critical signaling molecules upstream and downstream of mTOR differ between non-tumor brain and gliomas of any grade. The single variable whose expression did not differ between non-tumor brain and gliomas was phosphorylated-S6, suggesting that other protein kinases, in addition to mTOR, contribute significantly to S6 phosphorylation. mTOR provides a rational therapeutic target in gliomas of all grades, and clinical benefit may emerge as mTOR inhibitors are combined with additional agents.
Authors: M S Neshat; I K Mellinghoff; C Tran; B Stiles; G Thomas; R Petersen; P Frost; J J Gibbons; H Wu; C L Sawyers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-08-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Esteller; J Garcia-Foncillas; E Andion; S N Goodman; O F Hidalgo; V Vanaclocha; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gheeyoung Choe; Steve Horvath; Timothy F Cloughesy; Katherine Crosby; David Seligson; Aarno Palotie; Landon Inge; Bradley L Smith; Charles L Sawyers; Paul S Mischel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Arvind Rao; Ganesh Rao; David A Gutman; Adam E Flanders; Scott N Hwang; Daniel L Rubin; Rivka R Colen; Pascal O Zinn; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Justin S Kirby; C Carl Jaffe; John Freymann Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: María I Ayuso; Macarena Hernández-Jiménez; María E Martín; Matilde Salinas; Alberto Alcázar Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Elias A El Habr; Christos Adamopoulos; Georgia Levidou; Aggeliki A Saetta; Penelope Korkolopoulou; Christina Piperi Journal: Neurol Res Int Date: 2012-02-21
Authors: Elena Martínez-Sáez; Vicente Peg; Arantxa Ortega-Aznar; Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Jessica Camacho; Javier Hernández-Losa; Joan Carles Ferreres Piñas; Santiago Ramón Y Cajal Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 4.452