OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment for elderly patients (age >70 years) with glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. We conducted a prospective trial in 43 consecutive elderly patients with GBM treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) followed by adjuvant temozolomide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients 70 years of age or older with a newly diagnosed GBM and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 60 were treated with hypofractionated RT (6 fractions of 5 Gy each for a total of 30 Gy over 2 weeks) followed by up to 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m(2) for 5 days during each 28 day cycle). The HRQOL was assessed with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life. RESULTS: The median OS was 9.3 months and the median PFS was 6.3 months. The 6 and 12 month survival rates were 86% and 35%, respectively. The 6 and 12 month PFS rates were 55% and 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis KPS was the only significant independent predictive factor of survival (P = 0.008). Neurological deterioration occurred during or after RT in 16% of patients and was resolved in most cases with the use of steroids. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 28% of patients during the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment with temozolomide. The treatment had no negative effect on HRQOL, however, fatigue (P = 0.02) and constipation (P = 0.01) scales worsened over time. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated RT followed by temozolomide may provide survival benefit maintaining a good quality of life in elderly patients with GBM. It may represent a reasonable therapeutic approach especially in patients with less favourably prognostic factors.
OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment for elderly patients (age >70 years) with glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. We conducted a prospective trial in 43 consecutive elderly patients with GBM treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) followed by adjuvant temozolomide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients 70 years of age or older with a newly diagnosed GBM and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 60 were treated with hypofractionated RT (6 fractions of 5 Gy each for a total of 30 Gy over 2 weeks) followed by up to 12 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m(2) for 5 days during each 28 day cycle). The HRQOL was assessed with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life. RESULTS: The median OS was 9.3 months and the median PFS was 6.3 months. The 6 and 12 month survival rates were 86% and 35%, respectively. The 6 and 12 month PFS rates were 55% and 12%, respectively. In multivariate analysis KPS was the only significant independent predictive factor of survival (P = 0.008). Neurological deterioration occurred during or after RT in 16% of patients and was resolved in most cases with the use of steroids. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity occurred in 28% of patients during the adjuvant chemotherapy treatment with temozolomide. The treatment had no negative effect on HRQOL, however, fatigue (P = 0.02) and constipation (P = 0.01) scales worsened over time. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated RT followed by temozolomide may provide survival benefit maintaining a good quality of life in elderly patients with GBM. It may represent a reasonable therapeutic approach especially in patients with less favourably prognostic factors.
Authors: W Roa; P M A Brasher; G Bauman; M Anthes; E Bruera; A Chan; B Fisher; D Fulton; S Gulavita; C Hao; S Husain; A Murtha; K Petruk; D Stewart; P Tai; R Urtasun; J G Cairncross; P Forsyth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-05-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephanie E Combs; Johanna Wagner; Marc Bischof; Thomas Welzel; Florian Wagner; Jürgen Debus; Daniela Schulz-Ertner Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-10-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J J McAleese; S P Stenning; S Ashley; D Traish; F Hines; S Sardell; D Guerrero; Michael Brada Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: G Minniti; V De Sanctis; R Muni; F Filippone; A Bozzao; M Valeriani; M F Osti; U De Paula; G Lanzetta; V Tombolini; R Maurizi Enrici Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Giuseppe Minniti; M Salvati; A Arcella; F Buttarelli; A D'Elia; G Lanzetta; V Esposito; S Scarpino; R Maurizi Enrici; F Giangaspero Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-08-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mateo Tomas Fariña Nuñez; Pamela Franco; Debora Cipriani; Nicolas Neidert; Simon P Behringer; Irina Mader; Daniel Delev; Christian Fung; Jürgen Beck; Roman Sankowski; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Dieter Henrik Heiland; Oliver Schnell Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Hubert Pan; John Alksne; Arno J Mundt; Kevin T Murphy; Mariel Cornell; Santosh Kesari; Joshua D Lawson Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Dieter Henrik Heiland; Gerrit Haaker; Ralf Watzlawick; Daniel Delev; Waseem Masalha; Pamela Franco; Marcia Machein; Ori Staszewski; Oliver Oelhke; Nils Henrik Nicolay; Oliver Schnell Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 4.130