Literature DB >> 18757653

Frequency and management of breakthrough bleeding with continuous use of the transvaginal contraceptive ring: a randomized controlled trial.

Patricia J Sulak1, Virginia Smith, Andrea Coffee, Iris Witt, Alicia L Kuehl, Thomas J Kuehl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess bleeding patterns with continuous use of the transvaginal contraceptive ring.
METHODS: We did a prospective analysis of daily menstrual flow during a 21/7 cycle followed by 6 months of continuous use and institution of a randomized protocol to manage breakthrough bleeding/spotting. Seventy-four women completed the baseline 21/7 phase and were randomized equally into two groups during the continuous phase. Group 1 was instructed to replace the ring monthly on the same calendar day with no ring-free days. Group 2 was instructed to use the same process, but if breakthrough bleeding/spotting occurred for 5 days or more, they were to remove the ring for 4 days, store it, and then reinsert that ring.
RESULTS: Sixty-five women completed the continuous phase with reduced average flow scores in the continuous phase compared with the 21/7 phase (P<.02). Most patients had no to minimal bleeding during continuous use, with group 2 experiencing a statistically greater percentage of days without breakthrough bleeding or spotting (95%) compared with group 1 (89%) (P=.016). Instituting a 4-day hormone-free interval was more (P<.001) effective in resolving breakthrough bleeding/spotting than continuing ring use.
CONCLUSION: A reduction in bleeding occurred during continuous use with replacement of the transvaginal ring compared with baseline 21/7 use. Continuous vaginal ring use resulted in an acceptable bleeding profile in most patients, reduction in flow, reduction in pelvic pain, and a high continuation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757653     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181842071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  When to suggest this OC alternative.

Authors:  Kate Rowland; Sarah-Anne Schumann
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Evidence-based guidance on Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use: identification of research gaps.

Authors:  Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Emily M Godfrey; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing).

Authors:  Devorah R Wieder; Lynn Pattimakiel
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-11-12

Review 4.  Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Alison Edelman; Elizabeth Micks; Maria F Gallo; Jeffrey T Jensen; David A Grimes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-29

Review 5.  Benefits of reversible contraception.

Authors:  Helena Kopp Kallner
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-29

6.  Norethindrone is superior to combined oral contraceptive pills in short-term delay of menses and onset of breakthrough bleeding: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joshua Dean; Katherine J Kramer; Fauzia Akbary; Shaunte Wade; Maik Hüttemann; Jay M Berman; Maurice-Andre Recanati
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Vaginal rings for delivery of HIV microbicides.

Authors:  R Karl Malcolm; Susan M Fetherston; Clare F McCoy; Peter Boyd; Ian Major
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-11-20

8.  Efficacy of combined contraceptive vaginal ring versus oral contraceptive pills in achieving hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis suppression in egg donor in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Robin Lynn Thomas; Lisa Marie Halvorson; Bruce Richard Carr; Kathleen Marie Doody; Kevin John Doody
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2013-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.