Literature DB >> 18757651

High-concentration supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of postcesarean surgical site infection: a randomized controlled trial.

Carolyn Gardella1, Lynne Bartholomew Goltra, Ellen Laschansky, Linda Drolette, Amalia Magaret, H S Chadwick, David Eschenbach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Most postcesarean infections are caused by anaerobic bacteria. Oxidative killing, an important defense against surgical infections, depends on the oxygen level in contaminated tissue. Among patients undergoing colorectal surgery, perioperative supplemental oxygen decreased infection rates by 50%. We tested the hypothesis that high-concentration inspired oxygen decreases the incidence of surgical site infection in women undergoing cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Using a double blind technique, 143 women undergoing cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia after the onset of labor were randomly assigned to receive low- or high-concentration inspired oxygen via nonrebreathing mask during the operation and for 2 hours after. Surgical site infection was defined clinically as administration of antibiotics for postpartum endometritis or wound infection during the initial hospital stay or within 14 days of surgery. Interim statistical analysis was performed after 25% of the planned sample size (143 of 550) accrued using intention-to-treat principle. The stopping rule P value for futility was P>.11 with two planned interim analyses.
RESULTS: Postcesarean infection occurred in 17 (25%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15-35%) of 69 women assigned to high-concentration oxygen compared with 10 (14%, 95% CI 6-22%) of 74 women assigned to low-concentration inspired oxygen (relative risk 1.8, 95% CI 0.9-3.7, P=.13). The P value exceeded the P value for futility, suggesting these differences were unlikely to reach statistical significance with continued recruitment.
CONCLUSION: High-concentration perioperative oxygen delivered through a nonrebreathing mask did not decrease the risk of postcesarean surgical site infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757651     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318182340c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  17 in total

Review 1.  High inspired oxygen versus low inspired oxygen for reducing surgical site infection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongye Wang; Shukun Hong; Yuanyuan Liu; Yan Duan; Hongmei Yin
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  High-concentration oxygen and surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sunil V Patel; Shaun C Coughlin; Richard A Malthaner
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  CAGS and ACS evidence based reviews in surgery. 36. Effect of high perioperative oxygen fraction on surgical site infection.

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Giuseppe Papia; Stuart A McCloskey; Hiram C Polk; Ozan Akca; Motaz Qadan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The WHO recommendation for 80% perioperative oxygen is poorly justified.

Authors:  T Volk; J Peters; D I Sessler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Safety in the operating theatre--a transition to systems-based care.

Authors:  Thomas G Weiser; Michael P Porter; Ronald V Maier
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Infection control in colon surgery.

Authors:  Donald E Fry
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  WHO Needs High FIO2?

Authors:  Ozan Akca; Lorenzo Ball; F Javier Belda; Peter Biro; Andrea Cortegiani; Arieh Eden; Carlos Ferrando; Luciano Gattinoni; Zeev Goldik; Cesare Gregoretti; Thomas Hachenberg; Göran Hedenstierna; Harriet W Hopf; Thomas K Hunt; Paolo Pelosi; Motaz Qadan; Daniel I Sessler; Marina Soro; Mert Şentürk
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 8.  O2 No Longer the Go2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Effects of Giving Perioperative Oxygen Therapy of 30% FiO2 to 80% FiO2 on Surgical Site Infection and Mortality.

Authors:  Brianna K Smith; Ross H Roberts; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Should perioperative supplemental oxygen be routinely recommended for surgery patients? A Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lillian S Kao; Stefanos G Millas; Claudia Pedroza; Jon E Tyson; Kevin P Lally
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Hyperoxia: a review of the risks and benefits in adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Robert W Young
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.