Literature DB >> 18757469

Re-treatment after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.

M A Bragheeth1, U Fares, H S Dua.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) re-treatment for under correction or regression after primary LASIK procedures for myopia and myopic astigmatism.
METHODS: A prospective evaluation of 360 consecutive LASIK-treated eyes, for myopia and/or myopic astigmatism, 32 eyes of 34 patients were retreated and followed at 3, 6 and 12 months post-retreatment. Re-treatment was performed by lifting the original flap after cutting the epithelium around the flap edge with a fine needle. Standard ablation was performed based on the patient's residual refraction.
RESULTS: 9.4% of eyes required retreatment. Prior to re-treatment the mean manifest spherical equivalent (SE) was -0.99 (SD 1.48) D (range -0.75 to -2.63). The mean sphere was -0.79 (1.20) D (range -2.50 to -0.50), and the mean cylinder was -0.90 D (1.14) D (from -2.75 to 1.25). At 1-year follow-up 56% of the eyes were within +/-0.50 D SE, and 78% were within +/-1.00 D SE. 78% of the eyes examined at 1-year post-re-treatment managed unaided vision of 6/9 or better. Peripheral epithelial ingrowth not requiring treatment developed in two eyes. Second re-treatment for regression was performed in one eye. A significant correlation was found between the refractive regression and each of the following: preoperative refraction, attempted correction and ablation depth.
CONCLUSION: LASIK re-treatment for residual myopia, by lifting the original flap, is an effective option. Refractive results are fairly predictable, and refraction stabilises by 3 months after re-treatment. Lifting the corneal flap after cutting the epithelium on the flap edges is easy to perform and has a very low incidence of epithelial ingrowth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757469     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.143636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy and refractive outcomes of LASIK surgery in patients aged 65 or older.

Authors:  Paloma López-Montemayor; Jorge E Valdez-García; Denise Loya-García; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Clinical Outcomes of an Optimized Prolate Ablation Procedure for Correcting Residual Refractive Errors Following Laser Surgery.

Authors:  Byunghoon Chung; Hun Lee; Bong Joon Choi; Kyung Ryul Seo; Eung Kwon Kim; Dae Yune Kim; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-02

3.  Enhancement Options After Myopic Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Review.

Authors:  Jakob Siedlecki; Nikolaus Luft; Siegfried G Priglinger; Martin Dirisamer
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

4.  Disruption of ingrown epithelium via Nd:YAG laser or DIEYAG. A retrospective case series of Post-LASIK patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Cosgrove; Matthew J Borr; Michael L Keil
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-23

5.  Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in situ Keratomileusis with de novo Flap Creation Following Previous Microkeratome Laser in situ Keratomileusis.

Authors:  Sloan W Rush; Ryan B Rush
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Enhancement for Residual Refractive Error after Primary LASIK.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Noor F Basharat; Nour Bundogji; Emilie L Ungricht; Ines M Darquea; Matthew E Conley; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Enhancement of femtosecond lenticule extraction for visual symptomatic eye after myopia correction.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Peijun Yao; Zhi Chen; Meiyan Li; Yang Shen; Huamao Miao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.