Literature DB >> 18757276

An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols.

Philip J Rasch1, Simone Tilmes, Richard P Turco, Alan Robock, Luke Oman, Chih-Chieh Chen, Georgiy L Stenchikov, Rolando R Garcia.   

Abstract

We provide an overview of geoengineering by stratospheric sulphate aerosols. The state of understanding about this topic as of early 2008 is reviewed, summarizing the past 30 years of work in the area, highlighting some very recent studies using climate models, and discussing methods used to deliver sulphur species to the stratosphere. The studies reviewed here suggest that sulphate aerosols can counteract the globally averaged temperature increase associated with increasing greenhouse gases, and reduce changes to some other components of the Earth system. There are likely to be remaining regional climate changes after geoengineering, with some regions experiencing significant changes in temperature or precipitation. The aerosols also serve as surfaces for heterogeneous chemistry resulting in increased ozone depletion. The delivery of sulphur species to the stratosphere in a way that will produce particles of the right size is shown to be a complex and potentially very difficult task. Two simple delivery scenarios are explored, but similar exercises will be needed for other suggested delivery mechanisms. While the introduction of the geoengineering source of sulphate aerosol will perturb the sulphur cycle of the stratosphere signicantly, it is a small perturbation to the total (stratosphere and troposphere) sulphur cycle. The geoengineering source would thus be a small contributor to the total global source of 'acid rain' that could be compensated for through improved pollution control of anthropogenic tropospheric sources. Some areas of research remain unexplored. Although ozone may be depleted, with a consequent increase to solar ultraviolet-B (UVB) energy reaching the surface and a potential impact on health and biological populations, the aerosols will also scatter and attenuate this part of the energy spectrum, and this may compensate the UVB enhancement associated with ozone depletion. The aerosol will also change the ratio of diffuse to direct energy reaching the surface, and this may influence ecosystems. The impact of geoengineering on these components of the Earth system has not yet been studied. Representations for the formation, evolution and removal of aerosol and distribution of particle size are still very crude, and more work will be needed to gain confidence in our understanding of the deliberate production of this class of aerosols and their role in the climate system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757276     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  9 in total

1.  Geoengineering: the good, the MAD, and the sensible.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Impacts of light shading and nutrient enrichment geo-engineering approaches on the productivity of a stratified, oligotrophic ocean ecosystem.

Authors:  Nick J Hardman-Mountford; Luca Polimene; Takafumi Hirata; Robert J W Brewin; Jim Aiken
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Multiple input control strategies for robust and adaptive climate engineering in a low-order 3-box model.

Authors:  F Bonetti; C McInnes
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 4.  Ecosystem impacts of geoengineering: a review for developing a science plan.

Authors:  Lynn M Russell; Philip J Rasch; Georgina M Mace; Robert B Jackson; John Shepherd; Peter Liss; Margaret Leinen; David Schimel; Naomi E Vaughan; Anthony C Janetos; Philip W Boyd; Richard J Norby; Ken Caldeira; Joonas Merikanto; Paulo Artaxo; Jerry Melillo; M Granger Morgan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  A 'rare biosphere' microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Norbert Bittner; Pinsurang Deevong; Michael Wagner; Alexander Loy
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering.

Authors:  John A Dykema; David W Keith; James G Anderson; Debra Weisenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Detection of Sulfur Dioxide by Broadband Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (BBCEAS).

Authors:  Ryan Thalman; Nitish Bhardwaj; Callum E Flowerday; Jaron C Hansen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants.

Authors:  Kirk R Smith; Michael Jerrett; H Ross Anderson; Richard T Burnett; Vicki Stone; Richard Derwent; Richard W Atkinson; Aaron Cohen; Seth B Shonkoff; Daniel Krewski; C Arden Pope; Michael J Thun; George Thurston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A risk-based framework for assessing the effectiveness of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.

Authors:  Angus J Ferraro; Andrew J Charlton-Perez; Eleanor J Highwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.