Literature DB >> 18757179

The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double-blind trial.

J Schortinghuis1, A L J J Bronckers, J Gravendeel, B Stegenga, G M Raghoebar.   

Abstract

Whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy stimulates osteogenesis in mandibular distraction was investigated in a double-blind trial. Nine patients underwent a vertical mandibular distraction over a distance of 5.1+/-1.2mm. Ultrasound or placebo therapy was started daily from the first day of distraction. After 46+/-8.1 days consolidation, two endosseous implants were inserted and a transmandibular biopsy was taken. Ultrasonographs were taken regularly to follow osteogenesis inside the gap. There were no complications during the 44+/-7.1 months of follow-up. Microradiographic measurements of the biopsies revealed no differences in the area of mineralized tissue in the distraction gap. The cranially distracted bone segment appeared significantly more radiolucent than the caudal bone. Histological examination showed large lacunae inside the cranially distracted bone segment, filled with clusters of osteoclasts and surrounded by clear tetracycline double labels. Within the distraction gap, woven bone was present, with no apparent differences between the treatment groups. Ultrasonographic follow-up revealed that osteogenesis inside the distraction gap progresses from 4 to 20 weeks post distraction, with no differences between the ultrasound and the placebo groups. In summary, ultrasound treatment does not appear to stimulate bone formation in the severely resorbed vertical distracted mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757179     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  The applications of ultrasound, and ultrasonography in dentistry: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Mohamed Elbarbary; Adam Sgro; Saber Khazaei; Michael Goldberg; Howard C Tenenbaum; Amir Azarpazhooh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Pietro Felice; Georgios Karatzopoulos; Helen V Worthington; Paul Coulthard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

Review 4.  Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefan Schandelmaier; Alka Kaushal; Lyubov Lytvyn; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Reed A C Siemieniuk; Thomas Agoritsas; Gordon H Guyatt; Per O Vandvik; Rachel Couban; Brent Mollon; Jason W Busse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-02-22

5.  Effect of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shenghan Lou; Houchen Lv; Zhirui Li; Peifu Tang; Yansong Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Prospective utility of therapeutic ultrasound in dentistry-Review with recent comprehensive update.

Authors:  Shalu Rai; Mandeep Kaur; Sumit Goel; Sapna Panjwani; Shailly Singh
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-08-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.