Literature DB >> 18757164

HPV testing versus repeat Pap testing for the management of a minor abnormal Pap smear: evaluation of a decision aid to support informed choice.

Kirsten J McCaffery1, Les Irwig, Siew Foong Chan, Petra Macaskill, Alexandra Barratt, Mary Lewicka, Judith Clarke, Edith Weisberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine women's informed preference for the management of a mildly abnormal Pap smear and the impact of a decision aid.
METHODS: Women (n=106) were given a choice of management supported by a decision aid and surveyed before, and after decision making to evaluate predictors of choice and decision aid impact.
RESULTS: HPV triage was preferred by most women (65%) although a substantial minority selected repeat Pap testing (35%). Women who chose HPV triage were more likely to have had children, have had a previous abnormal Pap smear and were more distressed than women who chose a repeat Pap test. In total, 68% of women made an informed choice. Rapid timing of follow-up was important for women choosing HPV testing. The lower chance of colposcopy and greater opportunity for regression, were rated as important by women choosing Pap testing. Decisional conflict was lower among women who chose HPV triage. No other differences in short-term psychological outcomes were found.
CONCLUSION: The decision aid supported informed choice among the majority of women. Women tailored their choice to their practical, health and psychological needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Offering women an informed choice for a mildly abnormal Pap smear may enable women to select the management that best suits their circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757164     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

Review 1.  Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Stephen H Taplin; Rebecca Anhang Price; Caroline Cranos; Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Psychosocial outcomes of three triage methods for the management of borderline abnormal cervical smears: an open randomised trial.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Les Irwig; Robin Turner; Siew Foong Chan; Petra Macaskill; Mary Lewicka; Judith Clarke; Edith Weisberg; Alex Barratt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-02-23

3.  Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing.

Authors:  M Hendry; D Pasterfield; R Lewis; A Clements; S Damery; R D Neal; R Adke; D Weller; C Campbell; J Patnick; P Sasieni; C Hurt; S Wilson; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the USA, the UK and Australia: an international survey.

Authors:  Rachael H Dodd; Kirsten J McCaffery; Laura A V Marlow; Remo Ostini; Gregory D Zimet; Jo Waller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Prevalence of clinically significant decisional conflict: an analysis of five studies on decision-making in primary care.

Authors:  Philippe Thompson-Leduc; Stéphane Turcotte; Michel Labrecque; France Légaré
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  The effect of information about overdetection of breast cancer on women's decision-making about mammography screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jolyn Hersch; Alexandra Barratt; Jesse Jansen; Nehmat Houssami; Les Irwig; Gemma Jacklyn; Haryana Dhillon; Hazel Thornton; Kevin McGeechan; Kirsten Howard; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.