Literature DB >> 18757128

Impact of maternity unit closures on access to obstetrical care: the French experience between 1998 and 2003.

Hugo Pilkington1, Béatrice Blondel, Marion Carayol, Gérard Breart, Jennifer Zeitlin.   

Abstract

As in many other countries, the number of maternity units has diminished substantially in France, raising concerns about the reduced accessibility of obstetric services. We describe here the impact of closures on distance and mean travel time between pregnant women's homes and maternity units. We used data from the 1998 and 2003 French National Perinatal Surveys and from vital registries to measure indicators of accessibility: straight-line distance to the nearest maternity unit, number of units within a 15-km radius and reported travel time to the unit for delivery. We analyzed these measures for all births, births in rural versus urban areas and according to regional rates of maternity closures. From 1998 to 2003, 20% of maternity units closed (reducing the number from 759 to 621) with regional variations in the rate of closure from 0.0% to 36.0%. Mean distance to the nearest maternity unit increased (6.6-7.2 km, p < 0.001). The proportion of women living more than 30 km from a maternity ward was low; but rose from 1.4% to 1.8%. The number of maternity units with a 15-km radius of the place of residence fell (median, 3 to 2). Differences were more marked in rural areas and in regions highly affected by closures. However, reported travel time did not increase and even declined slightly for women from urban areas and in regions moderately affected by the closures. As such, the closures do not appear to have had a negative impact on the geographic accessibility of maternity units. Pregnant women were faced with a reduction in the number of maternity units near their homes and our results suggest that they more often chose their maternity units based on proximity. A full assessment of the impact of closures on accessibility to obstetric services would require information on how these changes affected available choices for care during pregnancy and delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18757128     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  Travel Time to Hospital for Childbirth: Comparing Calculated Versus Reported Travel Times in France.

Authors:  Hugo Pilkington; Caroline Prunet; Béatrice Blondel; Hélène Charreire; Evelyne Combier; Marc Le Vaillant; Jeanne-Marie Amat-Roze; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-01

2.  Association Between Loss of Hospital-Based Obstetric Services and Birth Outcomes in Rural Counties in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Peiyin Hung; Carrie Henning-Smith; Michelle M Casey; Shailendra Prasad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The impact of obstetric unit closures on maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Sindhu K Srinivas; Corinne Ahlberg; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  The geography of maternal and newborn health: the state of the art.

Authors:  Steeve Ebener; Maria Guerra-Arias; James Campbell; Andrew J Tatem; Allisyn C Moran; Fiifi Amoako Johnson; Helga Fogstad; Karin Stenberg; Sarah Neal; Patricia Bailey; Reid Porter; Zoe Matthews
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  Where does distance matter? Distance to the closest maternity unit and risk of foetal and neonatal mortality in France.

Authors:  Hugo Pilkington; Béatrice Blondel; Nicolas Drewniak; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.367

6.  Accessibility of Prenatal Care Can Affect Inequitable Health Outcomes of Pregnant Women Living in Obstetric Care Underserved Areas: a Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Mi Young Kwak; Seung Mi Lee; Tae Ho Lee; Sang Jun Eun; Jin Yong Lee; Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 5.354

7.  Choice in maternity care: associations with unit supply, geographic accessibility and user characteristics.

Authors:  Hugo Pilkington; Béatrice Blondel; Nicolas Drewniak; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.918

Review 8.  A review of rural and remote health service indexes: are they relevant for the development of an Australian rural birth index?

Authors:  Jennifer Pilcher; Sue Kruske; Lesley Barclay
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The effect of concentrating obstetrics services in fewer hospitals on patient access: a simulation.

Authors:  Soichi Koike; Masatoshi Matsumoto; Hiroo Ide; Saori Kashima; Hidenao Atarashi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  How far is too far? A nationwide cross-sectional study for establishing optimal hospital access time for Korean pregnant women.

Authors:  Mi Young Kwak; Seung Mi Lee; Hyun Joo Kim; Sang Jun Eun; Won Mo Jang; Hyemin Jung; Yoon Kim; Jin Yong Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.