BACKGROUND: Despite advances in first-line therapy, there are few data on treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) at recurrence. Temozolomide (TMZ) is well tolerated and may have activity despite prior TMZ exposure if novel dose schedules are used. METHODS: The authors reviewed their experience with a continuous TMZ schedule (50 mg/m(2) daily), given at progression after conventional 5-day TMZ. Patients were reported in 3 groups: 1) GBM after progression on conventional TMZ; 2) GBM at first recurrence after completion of standard concomitant and adjuvant TMZ; and 3) patients with other anaplastic gliomas at second relapse on conventional TMZ. RESULTS: In Group 1, 21 patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 33 years-68 years) received a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-12 cycles) of continuous TMZ at 50 mg/m(2). Overall clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) was 47%, with 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) of 17%. In Group 2, 14 patients with GBM, median age 52 years (range, 38 years-62 years) received continuous TMZ at progression after initial TMZ/radiotherapy (RT) and adjuvant TMZ. The median interval after adjuvant TMZ was 3 months (range, 2 months-10 months). A median of 5 cycles of TMZ was given, and 6-month PFS was 57%. In Group 3, 14 patients with a median age of 49 years (range, 34 years-56 years) received continuous TMZ; 2 partial responses and 6 with stable disease were seen, with a 6-month PFS of 42%. Toxicities were mild and well tolerated; lymphopenia was common but no serious opportunistic infections were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although retrospective, our results demonstrate that continuous daily administration of TMZ is an active regimen despite prior TMZ therapy. The excellent tolerability of this regimen may allow future combination with other alkylating agents or with novel therapies. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in first-line therapy, there are few data on treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) at recurrence. Temozolomide (TMZ) is well tolerated and may have activity despite prior TMZ exposure if novel dose schedules are used. METHODS: The authors reviewed their experience with a continuous TMZ schedule (50 mg/m(2) daily), given at progression after conventional 5-day TMZ. Patients were reported in 3 groups: 1) GBM after progression on conventional TMZ; 2) GBM at first recurrence after completion of standard concomitant and adjuvant TMZ; and 3) patients with other anaplastic gliomas at second relapse on conventional TMZ. RESULTS: In Group 1, 21 patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 33 years-68 years) received a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-12 cycles) of continuous TMZ at 50 mg/m(2). Overall clinical benefit (complete response, partial response, and stable disease) was 47%, with 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) of 17%. In Group 2, 14 patients with GBM, median age 52 years (range, 38 years-62 years) received continuous TMZ at progression after initial TMZ/radiotherapy (RT) and adjuvant TMZ. The median interval after adjuvant TMZ was 3 months (range, 2 months-10 months). A median of 5 cycles of TMZ was given, and 6-month PFS was 57%. In Group 3, 14 patients with a median age of 49 years (range, 34 years-56 years) received continuous TMZ; 2 partial responses and 6 with stable disease were seen, with a 6-month PFS of 42%. Toxicities were mild and well tolerated; lymphopenia was common but no serious opportunistic infections were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although retrospective, our results demonstrate that continuous daily administration of TMZ is an active regimen despite prior TMZ therapy. The excellent tolerability of this regimen may allow future combination with other alkylating agents or with novel therapies. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Louis Burt Nabors; Mario Ammirati; Philip J Bierman; Henry Brem; Nicholas Butowski; Marc C Chamberlain; Lisa M DeAngelis; Robert A Fenstermaker; Allan Friedman; Mark R Gilbert; Deneen Hesser; Matthias Holdhoff; Larry Junck; Ronald Lawson; Jay S Loeffler; Moshe H Maor; Paul L Moots; Tara Morrison; Maciej M Mrugala; Herbert B Newton; Jana Portnow; Jeffrey J Raizer; Lawrence Recht; Dennis C Shrieve; Allen K Sills; David Tran; Nam Tran; Frank D Vrionis; Patrick Y Wen; Nicole McMillian; Maria Ho Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Ufuk Abacioglu; Hale B Caglar; Perran F Yumuk; Zuleyha Akgun; Beste M Atasoy; Meric Sengoz Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Grit Welzel; Julian Gehweiler; Stefanie Brehmer; Jens-Uwe Appelt; Andreas von Deimling; Marcel Seiz-Rosenhagen; Peter Schmiedek; Frederik Wenz; Frank A Giordano Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: David A Reardon; James J Vredenburgh; Annick Desjardins; Katherine Peters; Sridharan Gururangan; John H Sampson; Jennifer Marcello; James E Herndon; Roger E McLendon; Dorothea Janney; Allan H Friedman; Darell D Bigner; Henry S Friedman Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Alba A Brandes; A Tosoni; E Franceschi; V Blatt; A Santoro; M Faedi; P Amistà; M Gardiman; R Labianca; C Bianchini; M Ermani; M Reni Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2009-01-24 Impact factor: 3.333