Literature DB >> 18756402

Reliability of oesophageal pH recording for the detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Marissa C Aanen1, Albert J Bredenoord, Melvin Samsom, Andre J P M Smout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the new gold standard oesophageal impedance monitoring, pH monitoring is still used frequently for detection of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR). Besides drops in pH from above to below pH4, drops of > or =1 unit are also used as a marker for GOR. In this study the objective was to investigate the accuracy of drops in pH for detection of GOR, using impedance monitoring as the gold standard.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nineteen GORD patients (9 M, 55+/-11 years) underwent combined 24-h pH-impedance recording off acid-suppressive therapy. All drops in pH > or =0.5 pH units, with a duration > or =4 s, reaching the nadir pH within 5 s after onset were included. Reflux events detected with impedance monitoring were taken as the reference.
RESULTS: In total, 2221 drops in pH were found; 47% were acid (nadir pH <4), 47% weakly acidic (nadir pH between pH7 and 4) and 5% were superimposed (pH drop starting below pH4). The sensitivities of acid, weakly acidic and superimposed pH drops > or =1 were 91%, 28%, 24%, respectively, and the percentages of false-positive reflux episodes were 20, 56 and 54, respectively. Acid reflux with a cut-off > or =0.5 and < or =3.3 had a moderate-to-good sensitivity (94-70%) and low false-positive percentages (23-13%). In contrast, weakly acidic and superimposed reflux showed greater false-positive than true-positive percentages for all cut-off values.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to impedance monitoring, detection of reflux with pH monitoring is clearly inferior. When drops in pH > or =1 are used irrespective of nadir pH as an indicator of reflux episodes, the number of reflux episodes is overestimated. Decreases from above to below 4 with cut-offs between > or =0.5 and < or =3.3 are the most indicative of true reflux episodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18756402     DOI: 10.1080/00365520802308003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  5 in total

1.  Scintigraphy in laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a definitive diagnostic test?

Authors:  Gregory L Falk; John Beattie; Alvin Ing; S E Falk; Michael Magee; Leticia Burton; Hans Van der Wall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Fundoplication for laryngopharyngeal reflux despite preoperative dysphagia.

Authors:  G L Falk; H Van der Wall; L Burton; M G Falk; H O'Donnell; S J Vivian
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Comparison of the efficiencies of esophageal manometry, vector volume analysis and esophagus pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Emrah Aydın; Rahşan Özcan; Ergun Erdoğan; Gonca Tekant
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Diagnosing GORD in Respiratory Medicine.

Authors:  Chris J Timms; Deborah H Yates; Paul S Thomas
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 5.  Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  Boudewijn F Kessing; André J P M Smout; Albert J Bredenoord
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.