Literature DB >> 18755874

Results of surgical and somatostatin analog therapies and their combination in acromegaly: a retrospective analysis of the German Acromegaly Register.

S Petersenn1, M Buchfelder, M Reincke, C M Strasburger, H Franz, R Lohmann, H-J Quabbe, U Plöckinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on surgical and medical treatment outcomes in acromegaly mostly originate from specialized centers. We retrospectively analyzed the data on surgery, primary somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy, surgery preceded by SSA, and SSA preceded by surgery in 1485 patients from the German Acromegaly Register.
METHODS: Two trained nurses visited all centers (N=42) for data acquisition.
RESULTS: Primary surgery: out of 889 patients, 554 yielded analyzable data (microadenomas 22.9%, macroadenomas 77.1%). GH and IGF1 normalized in 54.3 and 67.2%. Partial or total pituitary insufficiency occurred in 28.6% initially and 41.2% post-surgery. Primary SSA (>or=3 months): out of 329 patients, 145 yielded analyzable data (microadenomas 26.7%, macroadenomas 73.3%). GH and IGF1 normalized in 36.3 and 30.5%, increasing to 40.8 and 41.5% with longer SSA (>or=360 days) in 54 patients. Pituitary function did not change. SSA (>or=3 months) prior to surgery: out of 234 patients, 93 yielded analyzable data. Post-surgery GH and IGF1 was normalized in 62.9 and 68.4%. GH improvement was slightly, but significantly better after SSA pretreatment. Surgery followed by SSA: out of 122 patients, 34 yielded analyzable data. GH and IGF1 normalized during SSA in 24.1 and 45.5%. Relative GH decrease was significantly larger compared with primary SSA.
CONCLUSIONS: Pituitary surgery was more effective to lower GH and IGF1 concentrations than primary SSA. Primary SSA may be an option in selected patients. SSA prior to surgery only marginally improved surgical outcome. Debulking surgery may result in better final outcome in patients with a high GH concentration and a large tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18755874     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  12 in total

1.  Pre-surgical treatment with somatostatin analogues in patients with acromegaly: the case for.

Authors:  D Ferone; F Gatto; F Minuto
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Pre-surgical treatment with somatostatin analogues in patients with acromegaly: the case against.

Authors:  M Losa; V G Crippa
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Epidemiology of acromegaly in Italy: analysis from a large longitudinal primary care database.

Authors:  Federico Gatto; Gianluca Trifirò; Francesco Lapi; Francesco Cocchiara; Claudia Campana; Carlotta Dell'Aquila; Carmen Ferrajolo; Marica Arvigo; Claudio Cricelli; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Implications of Somatostatin Analogues in the Treatment of Acromegaly.

Authors:  Karim Gariani; Patrick Meyer; Jacques Philippe
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2013-08-23

5.  Pros and cons in endocrine practice: pre-surgical treatment with somatostatin analogues in acromegaly.

Authors:  Marco Losa; Jens Bollerslev
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Changes in acromegaly treatment over four decades in Spain: analysis of the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (REA).

Authors:  Gemma Sesmilo; Sonia Gaztambide; Eva Venegas; Antonio Picó; Carlos Del Pozo; Concepción Blanco; Elena Torres; Cristina Álvarez-Escolà; Carmen Fajardo; Rogelio García; Rosa Cámara; Ignacio Bernabeu; Alfonso Soto; Carles Villabona; Alicia Serraclara; Irene Halperin; Victoria Alcázar; Elisabet Palomera; Susan M Webb
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues.

Authors:  Richard A Feelders; Leo J Hofland; Maarten O van Aken; Sebastian J Neggers; Steven W J Lamberts; Wouter W de Herder; Aart-Jan van der Lely
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control.

Authors:  A Ben-Shlomo; M C Sheppard; J M Stephens; S Pulgar; S Melmed
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 9.  Interpreting biochemical control response rates with first-generation somatostatin analogues in acromegaly.

Authors:  Annamaria Colao; Renata S Auriemma; Rosario Pivonello; Leandro Kasuki; Mônica R Gadelha
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 10.  Advancing Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas through Targeted Molecular Therapies: The Acromegaly and Cushing Disease Paradigms.

Authors:  Michael A Mooney; Elias D Simon; Andrew S Little
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.