Literature DB >> 18754451

Assessing the concentrations of polar organic microcontaminants from point sources in the aquatic environment: measure or model?

Andrew C Johnson1, Thomas Ternes, Richard J Williams, John P Sumpter.   

Abstract

To carry out meaningful ecotoxicity studies on novel polar organic microcontaminants, it is essential to know what concentrations wildlife may be exposed to. Traditionally these values were obtained by analytical chemistry, but in recent years GIS water quality models have been developed which may offer a quick and reliable way of getting the same information. Thus, two ways of obtaining basically the same information now exist, and an issue, therefore, arises as to which method is the most appropriate to use in which situation. To address this issue we have critically reviewed and compared measuring and modeling approaches for the determination of sewage effluent and river water concentrations of organic microcontaminants. Where model predictions and chemical measurements can be directly compared in sewage effluents, receiving waters, and across catchments, reported model mean values have all been within 1 order of magnitude of the measured values, with typically no more than a 3- or 4-fold difference. Interlaboratory chemical analysis of some organic microcontaminants in effluents in the challenging ng/L range have provided results which have varied from one another by a similar margin. No such comparison has been carried out yet for GIS water quality models to determine variation in predicted concentrations. As the level of ecotoxicological effects of many chemicals is often considerably higher than the reported measured or modeled values, such errors that might occur will often be of no consequence. But due to their extraordinary potency, much more accuracy is required with some natural and synthetic hormones. Significantly, modeling is no more complex to conduct when dealing with contaminants at ng/L compared with mg/L concentrations, but the same cannot be said for chemical analysis. A combination of modeling and measuring techniques will give the greatest confidence in risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18754451     DOI: 10.1021/es703091r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Disruption of the stress response in wastewater treatment works effluent-exposed three-spined sticklebacks persists after translocation to an unpolluted environment.

Authors:  Tom G Pottinger; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Predicted environmental concentration and fate of the top 10 most dispensed Australian prescription pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Timothy T X Ong; Ewan W Blanch; Oliver A H Jones
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mathematical modeling for estrogenic activity prediction of 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethynylestradiol mixtures in wastewater treatment plants effluent.

Authors:  Yien Fang Ting; Sarva Mangala Praveena; Ahmad Zaharin Aris; Sharifah Norkhadijah Syed Ismail; Irniza Rasdi
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  A High-Resolution Spatial Model to Predict Exposure to Pharmaceuticals in European Surface Waters: ePiE.

Authors:  Rik Oldenkamp; Selwyn Hoeks; Mirza Čengić; Valerio Barbarossa; Emily E Burns; Alistair B A Boxall; Ad M J Ragas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 9.028

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.