Literature DB >> 18754233

Consent to treatment: practice vis-à-vis principle.

Binaya Kumar Bastia1.   

Abstract

It is a principle recognised not only by our own but by other legal systems that ignorance of the law is no excuse for violating it. This is also expressed in the form of a legal presumption that everyone knows the law. So it is the duty of every person to be acquainted with that part of it which concerns him or her. In recent years there have been a number of malpractice suits based on lack of consent or inadequate consent from the patient for procedures used in treatment. The common meaning of consent is permission, whereas the law perceives it as a contract, that is, an agreement enforceable by law. Keeping this view, the present article aims at highlighting certain misconceptions prevailing regarding consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18754233     DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2008.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0974-8466


  2 in total

1.  The effect of a visual aid on the comprehension of cataract surgery in a rural, indigent South Indian population.

Authors:  Abraar M Karan; Daniel J Campbell; Hylton R Mayer
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-23

2.  Consent and the Indian medical practitioner.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar; Parul Mullick; Smita Prakash; Aseem Bharadwaj
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.