Literature DB >> 18754101

Low levels of methylmercury induce DNA damage in rats: protective effects of selenium.

Denise Grotto1, Gustavo R M Barcelos, Juliana Valentini, Lusânia M G Antunes, José Pedro F Angeli, Solange C Garcia, Fernando Barbosa.   

Abstract

In this study we examined the possible antigenotoxic effect of selenium (Se) in rats chronically exposed to low levels of methylmercury (MeHg) and the association between glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity and DNA lesions (via comet assay) in the same exposed animals. Rats were divided into six groups as follows: (Group I) received water; (Group II) received MeHg (100 mug/day); (Group III) received Se (2 mg/L drinking water); (Group IV) received Se (6 mg/L drinking water); (Group V) received MeHg (100 mug/day) and Se (2 mg/L drinking water); (Group VI) received MeHg (100 mug/day) and Se (6 mg/L drinking water). Total treatment time was 100 days. GSH-Px activity was determined spectrophotometrically and DNA damage was determined by comet assay. Mean GSH-Px activity in groups I, II, III, IV, V and VI were, respectively: 40.19 +/- 17.21; 23.63 +/- 6.04; 42.64 +/- 5.70; 38.50 +/- 7.15; 34.54 +/- 6.18 and 41.39 +/- 11.67 nmolNADPH/min/gHb. DNA damage was represented by a mean score from 0 to 300; the results for groups I, II, III, IV, V and VI were, respectively: 6.87 +/- 3.27; 124.12 +/- 13.74; 10.62 +/- 3.81; 13.25 +/- 1.76; 86.87 +/- 11.95 and 76.25 +/- 7.48. There was a significant inhibition of GSH-Px activity in group II compared with group I (P < 0.05). Groups V and VI did not show a difference in enzyme activity compared with groups III and IV, showing the possible protective action of Se. Comet assay presented a significant difference in DNA migration between group II and group I (P < 0.0001). Groups V and VI showed a significant reduction in MeHg-induced genotoxicity (P < 0.001) when compared with group II. A negative correlation (r = -0.559, P < 0.05) was found between GSH-Px activity and DNA lesion, showing that the greater the DNA damage, the lower the GSH-Px activity. Our findings demonstrated the oxidative and genotoxic properties of MeHg, even at low doses. Moreover, Se co-administration reestablished GSH-Px activity and reduced DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18754101     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-008-0353-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  9 in total

1.  Imaging Microstructural Damage and Alveolar Bone Loss in Rats Systemically Exposed to Methylmercury: First Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Géssica de Oliveira Lopes; Walessa Alana Bragança Aragão; Leonardo Oliveira Bittencourt; Bruna Puty; Armando Pereira Lopes; Sávio Monteiro Dos Santos; Marta Chagas Monteiro; Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de Oliveira; Márcia Cristina Freitas da Silva; Rafael Rodrigues Lima
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Assessment of mitochondrial DNA damage in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) collected near a mercury-contaminated river.

Authors:  Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Carl White; Christopher R Perkins; John J Schmerfeld; David Yates
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  NAD+ Supplementation Attenuates Methylmercury Dopaminergic and Mitochondrial Toxicity in Caenorhabditis Elegans.

Authors:  Samuel W Caito; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Does a role for selenium in DNA damage repair explain apparent controversies in its use in chemoprevention?

Authors:  Soumen Bera; Viviana De Rosa; Walid Rachidi; Alan M Diamond
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Antagonistic Growth Effects of Mercury and Selenium in Caenorhabditis elegans Are Chemical-Species-Dependent and Do Not Depend on Internal Hg/Se Ratios.

Authors:  Lauren H Wyatt; Sarah E Diringer; Laura A Rogers; Heileen Hsu-Kim; William K Pan; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  The effect of selenium supplementation in the prevention of DNA damage in white blood cells of hemodialyzed patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bronislaw A Zachara; Jolanta Gromadzinska; Jadwiga Palus; Zbigniew Zbrog; Rafal Swiech; Ewa Twardowska; Wojciech Wasowicz
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Heavy metals and epigenetic alterations in brain tumors.

Authors:  Maria Caffo; Gerardo Caruso; Giuseppe La Fata; Valeria Barresi; Maria Visalli; Mario Venza; Isabella Venza
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 8.  Advances in Understanding How Heavy Metal Pollution Triggers Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Wenzhen Yuan; Ning Yang; Xiangkai Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Permeation thresholds for hydrophilic small biomolecules across microvascular and epithelial barriers are predictable on basis of conserved biophysical properties.

Authors:  Hemant Sarin
Journal:  In Silico Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.