Literature DB >> 1875402

Perceived personal immunity to the consequences of drinking alcohol: the relationship between behavior and perception.

W B Hansen1, A E Raynor, B H Wolkenstein.   

Abstract

Heavy drinkers, moderate drinkers, light drinkers, and nondrinkers were asked to rate a variety of negative health and social consequences of using alcohol. Subjects made probability ratings for fictional others who were heavy, moderate, or light drinkers or nondrinkers. Subjects also made probability ratings for themselves as hypothetical heavy, moderate, or light drinkers or nondrinkers and for themselves actually. A pattern of perceived personal immunity was found across groups. Subjects rated fictional others and themselves as hypothetical drinkers to be more likely to experience negative consequences than their actual selves. All groups of subjects (heavy, moderate, and light drinkers and abstainers) rated their actual chances of experiencing negative consequences to be approximately equal. In contrast, heavy drinkers saw the effects of drinking for other heavy drinkers as less likely than did subjects who had light or abstinent drinking patterns who rated fictional heavy drinkers. These findings suggest that individuals who drink more tend to deny the potential harm that may result from alcohol consumption. Short-term social consequences were viewed as most likely to occur. Long-term consequences were perceived as least likely to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1875402     DOI: 10.1007/bf00845452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  21 in total

1.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-10

2.  Cognitive processes in adolescent drug use: the role of positivity bias and implications for prevention policy.

Authors:  A L Whaley
Journal:  Int J Addict       Date:  1986-03

3.  Increasing automobile seat belt use: an intervention emphasizing risk susceptibility.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; P D Grubb; J S Vautier
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1986-05

4.  Differential impact of three alcohol prevention curricula on hypothesized mediating variables.

Authors:  W B Hansen; J W Graham; B H Wolkenstein; B Z Lundy; J Pearson; B R Flay; C A Johnson
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  1988

Review 5.  The powers of John Barleycorn. Beliefs about the effects of alcohol on social behavior.

Authors:  B Critchlow
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1986-07

6.  A comparison of questionnaire and self-monitored reports of alcohol intake in a nonalcoholic population.

Authors:  D C Uchalik
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Drinking habits and expectancies about alcohol's effects for self versus others.

Authors:  D J Rohsenow
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-10

8.  Alcohol-related expectancies versus demographic/background variables in the prediction of adolescent drinking.

Authors:  B A Christiansen; M S Goldman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1983-04

9.  Alcohol-related expectancies: defined by phase of intoxication and drinking experience.

Authors:  L Southwick; C Steele; A Marlatt; M Lindell
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1981-10

10.  Beliefs about the effects of alcohol on self and others.

Authors:  B C Leigh
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1987-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  Randomized trials on consider this, a tailored, internet-delivered smoking prevention program for adolescents.

Authors:  David B Buller; Ron Borland; W Gill Woodall; John R Hall; Joan M Hines; Patricia Burris-Woodall; Gary R Cutter; Caroline Miller; James Balmford; Randall Starling; Bryan Ax; Laura Saba
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-11-17

2.  Are People Overoptimistic about the Effects of Heavy Drinking?

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Lindsey M Eldred; Tong Guo; Yanzhi Xu
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2013-08-01

3.  Addiction, drinking behavior, and driving under the influence.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Lindsey M Eldred; Dontrell V Davis
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 4.  Mobile Phone Apps for Behavioral Interventions for At-Risk Drinkers in Australia: Literature Review.

Authors:  Carol C Choo; André A D Burton
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.773

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.