PURPOSE: In order to record light-evoked responses from photoreceptor cells and the higher neuronal retinal network, the isolated vertebrate retina represents a sensitive tool for basic research of retinal function and for testing the toxicity of ocular therapeutics. In the past, this in vitro technique was optimized for frog and bovine retina; it should be transferred now to the isolated murine retina because the model could allow for functional testing of genes involved in retinal signalling using wild-type and gene-inactivated mice. Thus, alterations in the electroretinogram (ERG) may reveal differences in retinal information processing because of the inactivation of a specific gene. METHODS: We used a superfused vertebrate retina assay to test bovine and murine retina. RESULTS: In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the ERG recording technique from the isolated murine retina, we first determined the light intensity response and the stability of the a-wave amplitude during ERG recording, which did not differ between the species. However, testing the dihydropyridine sensitivity of the a-wave, we found that the murine a-wave was highly sensitive towards racemic isradipine (8-25 nM) but the bovine retina a-wave was not. A similar species-dependent difference was observed for mibefradil (10 muM). CONCLUSION: Murine and bovine retina differ with respect to transretinal signalling. At the level of photoreceptor cells, the ERG/a-wave is modulated by isradipine-sensitive voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, which trigger feedback signalling to photoreceptors.
PURPOSE: In order to record light-evoked responses from photoreceptor cells and the higher neuronal retinal network, the isolated vertebrate retina represents a sensitive tool for basic research of retinal function and for testing the toxicity of ocular therapeutics. In the past, this in vitro technique was optimized for frog and bovine retina; it should be transferred now to the isolated murine retina because the model could allow for functional testing of genes involved in retinal signalling using wild-type and gene-inactivated mice. Thus, alterations in the electroretinogram (ERG) may reveal differences in retinal information processing because of the inactivation of a specific gene. METHODS: We used a superfused vertebrate retina assay to test bovine and murine retina. RESULTS: In order to evaluate the sensitivity of the ERG recording technique from the isolated murine retina, we first determined the light intensity response and the stability of the a-wave amplitude during ERG recording, which did not differ between the species. However, testing the dihydropyridine sensitivity of the a-wave, we found that the murine a-wave was highly sensitive towards racemic isradipine (8-25 nM) but the bovine retina a-wave was not. A similar species-dependent difference was observed for mibefradil (10 muM). CONCLUSION:Murine and bovine retina differ with respect to transretinal signalling. At the level of photoreceptor cells, the ERG/a-wave is modulated by isradipine-sensitive voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, which trigger feedback signalling to photoreceptors.