Literature DB >> 18752216

Prediction of protein folding rates from primary sequences using hybrid sequence representation.

Yingfu Jiang1, Paul Iglinski, Lukasz Kurgan.   

Abstract

The ability to predict protein folding rates constitutes an important step in understanding the overall folding mechanisms. Although many of the prediction methods are structure based, successful predictions can also be obtained from the sequence. We developed a novel method called prediction of protein folding rates (PPFR), for the prediction of protein folding rates from protein sequences. PPFR implements a linear regression model for each of the mainstream folding dynamics including two-, multi-, and mixed-state proteins. The proposed method provides predictions characterized by strong correlations with the experimental folding rates, which equal 0.87 for the two- and multistate proteins and 0.82 for the mixed-state proteins, when evaluated with out-of-sample jackknife test. Based on in-sample and out-of-sample tests, the PPFR's predictions are shown to be better than most of other sequence only and structure-based predictors and complementary to the predictions of the most recent sequence-based QRSM method. We show that simultaneous incorporation of several characteristics, including the sequence, physiochemical properties of residues, and predicted secondary structure provides improved quality. This hybridized prediction model was analyzed to reveal the complementary factors that can be used in tandem to predict folding rates. We show that bigger proteins require more time for folding, higher helical and coil content and the presence of Phe, Asn, and Gln may accelerate the folding process, the inclusion of Ile, Val, Thr, and Ser may slow down the folding process, and for the two-state proteins increased beta-strand content may decelerate the folding process. Finally, PPFR provides strong correlation when predicting sequences with low similarity. 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18752216     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  7 in total

1.  Real value prediction of protein folding rate change upon point mutation.

Authors:  Liang-Tsung Huang; M Michael Gromiha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Fuzzy clustering of physicochemical and biochemical properties of amino acids.

Authors:  Indrajit Saha; Ujjwal Maulik; Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay; Dariusz Plewczynski
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.520

3.  A new method for predicting the subcellular localization of eukaryotic proteins with both single and multiple sites: Euk-mPLoc 2.0.

Authors:  Kuo-Chen Chou; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Plant-mPLoc: a top-down strategy to augment the power for predicting plant protein subcellular localization.

Authors:  Kuo-Chen Chou; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In-silico prediction of disorder content using hybrid sequence representation.

Authors:  Marcin J Mizianty; Tuo Zhang; Bin Xue; Yaoqi Zhou; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Machine Learning: How Much Does It Tell about Protein Folding Rates?

Authors:  Marc Corrales; Pol Cuscó; Dinara R Usmanova; Heng-Chang Chen; Natalya S Bogatyreva; Guillaume J Filion; Dmitry N Ivankov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Solution of Levinthal's Paradox and a Physical Theory of Protein Folding Times.

Authors:  Dmitry N Ivankov; Alexei V Finkelstein
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.